Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: g-Force COMP-2 A/S and ContiMaxContact MC6 are level at 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +374Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 74 77 -
72
Wet
Level72Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 73 73 -
64
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 61 – -
69
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +170Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 68 70 -
66
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 66 – -
70
Treadwear
g-Force COMP-2 A/S +565Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ContiMaxContact MC6 Professional tests (TWG score) 76 – Reviews found online 62 64 -
72
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +476Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 72 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 71 | 74 |
| Wet | 72 | 72 |
| Snow | 64 | – |
| Comfort | 69 | 70 |
| Noise | 66 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | 65 |
| Handling | 72 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
g-Force COMP-2 A/S
ContiMaxContact MC6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 3 |
| Rim diameters | — | 19″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S and Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S is stronger on treadwear. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on handling and dry.
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 72 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.