tirewheelguide

Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Falken ZIEX ZE329 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 23 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S is ahead, 70–51

Check price on Amazon · g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire ABFGoodrich

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE329

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 23 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +22
    50
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7440

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 72

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +21
    51
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7345

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 51

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +8
    57
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6148

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 57

    No road tests of snow for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +18
    51
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6834

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +5
    62
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6753

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 62

    No road tests of noise for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +24
    46
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6232

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 61.6 = 70

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 46

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +31
    41
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZIEX ZE329
    Reviews found online7241
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SFalken ZIEX ZE329
Relative Score 70 51
Dry 72 50
Wet 72 51
Snow 65 57
Comfort 69 51
Noise 67 62
Treadwear 70 46
Handling (owners) 72 41

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

ZIEX ZE329

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B ZIEX ZE329

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering great value
  • Good traction and grip on dry pavement
  • Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
  • Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
  • Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE329 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Falken ZIEX ZE329
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″6/32″
UTQG400 AA A480 A A
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Falken ZIEX ZE329

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 72 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 46 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 72 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 72 vs 51 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE329
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 72 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 72 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 65 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 69 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or ZIEX ZE329?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology