tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Goodyear Eagle RS-A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 76 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S is ahead, 70–58

Check price on Amazon · g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle RS-A on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire ABFGoodrich

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Goodyear Eagle RS-A
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle RS-A

All Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 76 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +10
    60
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle RS-A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7156

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Eagle RS-A: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle RS-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +13
    58
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle RS-A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7154

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    Eagle RS-A: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle RS-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    53
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle RS-A
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–42

    Eagle RS-A: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 42.1 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Eagle RS-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +11
    57
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle RS-A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6751

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    Eagle RS-A: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 50.6 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle RS-A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle RS-A
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–64

    Eagle RS-A: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 65

    No road tests of noise for Eagle RS-A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +10
    60
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle RS-A
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5956

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 59.4 = 70

    Eagle RS-A: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle RS-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +19
    50
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SEagle RS-A
    Reviews found online6950
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SGoodyear Eagle RS-A
Relative Score 70 58
Dry 70 60
Wet 71 58
Snow – 53
Comfort 68 57
Noise – 65
Treadwear 70 60
Handling (owners) 69 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

± 8

Eagle RS-A

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Eagle RS-A

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry road handling and cornering grip
  • Reliable tread life for many users, often reaching 60,000 miles

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction in heavy rain or standing water
  • Poor performance in deep snow and ice conditions
  • Increased road noise reported after significant mileage
All owner themes in the Eagle RS-A review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Goodyear Eagle RS-A
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—14
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″10 - 12/32″
UTQG400 AA A260 - 340 A A
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Goodyear Eagle RS-A

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 69 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 71 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 68 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 60 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle RS-A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle RS-A?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle RS-A?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 71 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle RS-A?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle RS-A?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 68 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Eagle RS-A?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology