Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 80 owner reviews. How we score

AVID Ascend leads, 74–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Yokohama AVID Ascend
Tire BYokohama

AVID Ascend

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 80 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    AVID Ascend +3
    73
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 73

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    AVID Ascend +6
    77
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online7180

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 77

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–66

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 68

    No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    AVID Ascend +5
    73
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6775

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    AVID Ascend: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–76

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 70

    No road tests of noise for AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SAVID Ascend
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6073

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 59.6 = 70

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    AVID Ascend +7
    76
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SAVID Ascend
    Reviews found online6976
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Yokohama AVID Ascend: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SYokohama AVID Ascend
Relative Score 70 74
Dry 70 73
Wet 71 77
Snow – 68
Comfort 68 73
Noise – 70
Treadwear 70 70
Handling (owners) 69 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

± 8

AVID Ascend

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B AVID Ascend

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
  • High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
  • Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain

Cons

  • Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
  • Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
  • Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
All owner themes in the AVID Ascend review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tirePremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″12/32″
UTQG400 AA A740 A A
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi75,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Yokohama AVID Ascend

Narrow edge: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 76 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 77 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 73 vs 68 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 73 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or AVID Ascend?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 77 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or AVID Ascend?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or AVID Ascend?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology