Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 11 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler vs Nitto Neo Gen — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 51 owner reviews. How we score
g-Force Profiler is ahead, 71–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
g-Force Profiler +961Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler Neo Gen Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 71 57 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70
Neo Gen: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61
No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
g-Force Profiler +1162Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler Neo Gen Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 58 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 73
Neo Gen: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 62
No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison48Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler Neo Gen Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online – 33 Neo Gen: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 33 = 48
No road tests of snow for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
g-Force Profiler +858Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler Neo Gen Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 54 g-Force Profiler: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
Neo Gen: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.5 = 58
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler Neo Gen Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 56 Neo Gen: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 62
No road tests of noise for Neo Gen. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
74
Treadwear
g-Force Profiler +1460Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler Neo Gen Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 79 56 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 74
Neo Gen: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Neo Gen. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
g-Force Profiler +958Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler Neo Gen Reviews found online 67 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | Nitto Neo Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 61 |
| Dry | 70 | 61 |
| Wet | 73 | 62 |
| Snow | – | 48 |
| Comfort | 66 | 58 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
g-Force Profiler
61
/ 100
Neo Gen
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Profiler
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip across a range of temperatures
- Impressive tread life and long-lasting durability
- High value for money at an affordable price point
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in heavy snow and winter weather
- Can be noisy on wet tarmac
- Firm or crashy ride quality over rough road surfaces
Tire B Neo Gen
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Strong dry grip and cornering stability for spirited driving
- Great value and affordable price point
Cons
- Increased road noise at highway speeds
- Firm or unrefined ride comfort
- Soft sidewalls reported by some users affecting initial turn-in response
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | B · Nitto Neo Gen |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 28 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
61
/ 100
Nitto Neo Gen
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 74 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 73 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 70 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 67 vs 58 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Tire B · Nitto Neo Gen
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Profiler or Neo Gen?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Profiler or Neo Gen?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler, 73 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Profiler or Neo Gen?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler, 70 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Profiler or Neo Gen?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler, 66 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Profiler or Neo Gen?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler, 74 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology