tirewheelguide

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 560 vs BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport 560 is ahead, 79–71

Check price on Amazon · SP Sport 560 or g-Force Profiler on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 560
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 560

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 83 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 79

    Dry

    SP Sport 560 +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 560g-Force Profiler
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8472

    SP Sport 560: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 84.4 = 79

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    SP Sport 560 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 560g-Force Profiler
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8474

    SP Sport 560: 60% × 77.9 (est.) + 40% × 83.6 = 80

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 78

    Comfort

    SP Sport 560 +11
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 560g-Force Profiler
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8366

    SP Sport 560: 40% × 71.7 (est.) + 60% × 83 = 78

    g-Force Profiler: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 560 or g-Force Profiler. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 76

    Treadwear

    SP Sport 560 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 560g-Force Profiler
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8379

    SP Sport 560: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 82.6 = 76

    g-Force Profiler: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 83

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport 560 +16
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 560g-Force Profiler
    Reviews found online8367
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 560BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Relative Score 79 71
Dry 79 70
Wet 80 73
Comfort 78 67
Treadwear 76 74
Handling (owners) 83 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport 560

± 8

g-Force Profiler

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 560

Pros

  • Exceptional value and competitive pricing compared to other premium tires
  • Strong performance and grip on dry city roads
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Handling on wet roads can be challenging, though potentially influenced by narrower tire widths
  • Limited size and vehicle context availability in early feedback
All owner themes in the SP Sport 560 review

Tire B g-Force Profiler

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip across a range of temperatures
  • Impressive tread life and long-lasting durability
  • High value for money at an affordable price point

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in heavy snow and winter weather
  • Can be noisy on wet tarmac
  • Firm or crashy ride quality over rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Profiler review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 560 B · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 560

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler

Winner: Dunlop SP Sport 560 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 560 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 83 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 78 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 79 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 80 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 560
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 560 or g-Force Profiler?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 560 or g-Force Profiler?

Dunlop SP Sport 560, 80 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 560 or g-Force Profiler?

Dunlop SP Sport 560, 79 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 560 or g-Force Profiler?

Dunlop SP Sport 560, 78 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 560 or g-Force Profiler?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology