Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 11 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
g-Force Profiler leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 1,120 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
g-Force Profiler +169Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 71 70 -
70
Wet
g-Force Profiler +565Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 70 64 -
67
Comfort
NanoEnergy 3 +370Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 66 70 -
72
Treadwear
g-Force Profiler +468Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 76 70 -
68
Handling
Level68Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 68 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 68 |
| Dry | 70 | 69 |
| Wet | 70 | 65 |
| Comfort | 67 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 68 |
| Handling | 68 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
g-Force Profiler
NanoEnergy 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Profiler
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip across a range of temperatures
- Impressive tread life and long-lasting durability
- High value for money at an affordable price point
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in heavy snow and winter weather
- Can be noisy on wet tarmac
- Firm or crashy ride quality over rough road surfaces
Tire B NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy 3 if comfort matters most to you.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 70 vs 65 on wet.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 72 vs 68 on treadwear.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.