Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 11 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 1,120 owner reviews. How we score
g-Force Profiler leads, 71–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 1,120 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
g-Force Profiler +169Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 72 70 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 69
No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
g-Force Profiler +568Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 67 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68
No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
NanoEnergy 3 +370Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 66 71 g-Force Profiler: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67
NanoEnergy 3: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 70.5 = 70
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Profiler or NanoEnergy 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
74
Treadwear
g-Force Profiler +470Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 79 73 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
NanoEnergy 3 +370Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 67 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 69 |
| Dry | 70 | 69 |
| Wet | 73 | 68 |
| Comfort | 67 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
g-Force Profiler
69
/ 100
NanoEnergy 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Profiler
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip across a range of temperatures
- Impressive tread life and long-lasting durability
- High value for money at an affordable price point
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in heavy snow and winter weather
- Can be noisy on wet tarmac
- Firm or crashy ride quality over rough road surfaces
Tire B NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 48 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
69
/ 100
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy 3 if comfort matters most to you. BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 73 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 74 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Profiler or NanoEnergy 3?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Profiler or NanoEnergy 3?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Profiler or NanoEnergy 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Profiler or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Profiler or NanoEnergy 3?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler, 74 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology