Tests 65 · 1 test Owners 65 · 80 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling long run)
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads, 67–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1079Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) 61 78 Reviews found online 82 81 Dry Braking (% of best) 93% 99% Dry Handling (% of best) 100% 100% Dry Handling Long Run (% of best) 100% 97% -
62
Wet
G Force Rival S 1.5 +1349Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) 69 45 Reviews found online 51 55 Wet Braking (% of best) 91% 85% Wet Handling (% of best) 96% 93% -
62
Comfort
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1173Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) 66 – Reviews found online 56 77 -
64
Noise
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +165Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) 63 – Reviews found online – 62 -
62
Treadwear
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +163Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Reviews found online 59 61 -
79
Handling
Level79Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Reviews found online 79 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 67 |
| Dry | 69 | 79 |
| Wet | 62 | 49 |
| Comfort | 62 | 73 |
| Noise | 64 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 63 |
| Handling | 79 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
G Force Rival S 1.5
67
/ 100
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #7/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 99% #2/6 · The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 | −5.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #5/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 100% #2/6 · The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling Long Run | Dry | 100% #3/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 97% #4/6 · The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 | +2.3 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 33% #3/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 20% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | +13.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #4/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 85% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | +6.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #5/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 93% #4/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | +3.0 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G Force Rival S 1.5
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and lateral grip
- Rapid warm-up, making it ideal for short-duration autocross
- Superior tread life and durability compared to other 200TW competitors
Cons
- Performance degrades significantly in wet or cold conditions
- Tendency to overheat and lose grip ('grease up') during long track sessions
- Increased road noise and tendency to tramline on public roads
Tire B Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
- Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
- Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2
Cons
- Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
- Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
- Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 7 |
| Rim diameters | — | 20″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
67
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Too close to call: BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 and Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 is stronger on wet. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R is stronger on comfort and dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 scores 62 vs 49 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 73 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 79 vs 69 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.