Tests 65 · 1 test Owners 61 · 80 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling long run)
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 80 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: G Force Rival S 1.5 and Pilot Sport Cup 2 R are level at 64.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 63 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +977Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 61 79 Reviews found online 78 74 G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 61.1 + 40% × 77.8 = 68
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 73.5 = 77
-
61
Wet
G Force Rival S 1.5 +853Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 69 46 Reviews found online 48 63 G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 69.4 + 40% × 48 = 61
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 45.9 + 40% × 63.2 = 53
-
58
Comfort
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +1270Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 66 ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 54 71 G Force Rival S 1.5: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 53.6 = 58
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 62 – Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) – G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
No owner ratings of noise for G Force Rival S 1.5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
60
Treadwear
G Force Rival S 1.5 +654Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 55 46 G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for G Force Rival S 1.5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
G Force Rival S 1.5 +173Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Pilot Sport Cup 2 R Reviews found online 74 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 64 |
| Dry | 68 | 77 |
| Wet | 61 | 53 |
| Comfort | 58 | 70 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 60 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
G Force Rival S 1.5
64
/ 100
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #7/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 96% #2/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #5/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 99% #3/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling Long Run | Dry | 100% #3/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 97% #4/6 · The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #4/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 85% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #5/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | 93% #4/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/7 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | #5/5 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G Force Rival S 1.5
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and lateral grip
- Rapid warm-up, making it ideal for short-duration autocross
- Superior tread life and durability compared to other 200TW competitors
Cons
- Performance degrades significantly in wet or cold conditions
- Tendency to overheat and lose grip ('grease up') during long track sessions
- Increased road noise and tendency to tramline on public roads
Tire B Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
- Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
- Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2
Cons
- Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
- Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
- Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 7 |
| Rim diameters | — | 20″ – 21″ |
| UTQG | — | 140 A - B A |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
64
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Too close to call: BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 and Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 is stronger on wet and treadwear. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R is stronger on comfort and dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 70 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 77 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 scores 61 vs 53 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 scores 60 vs 54 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G Force Rival S 1.5 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?
Which is better in the wet, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5, 61 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 77 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 70 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5, 60 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology