Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Kumho Ecsta PA51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

g-Force Sport COMP-2 leads, 69–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Sport COMP-2

High Performance Summer tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Tire BKumho

Ecsta PA51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews

Best test result: #7 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    g-Force Sport COMP-2 +1
    68
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Ecsta PA51
    Reviews found online7068
  2. 71

    Wet

    g-Force Sport COMP-2 +3
    68
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Ecsta PA51
    Reviews found online7268
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Ecsta PA51
    Reviews found online–57
  4. 66

    Comfort

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Ecsta PA51
    Reviews found online6363
  5. 65

    Noise

    Ecsta PA51 +4
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Ecsta PA51
    Reviews found online6372
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PA51 +4
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Ecsta PA51
    Professional tests (TWG score)7070
    Reviews found online6372
  7. 69

    Handling

    g-Force Sport COMP-2 +3
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Ecsta PA51
    Reviews found online6966
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Kumho Ecsta PA51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2Kumho Ecsta PA51
Relative Score 69 68
Dry 69 68
Wet 71 68
Snow – 62
Comfort 66 66
Noise 65 69
Treadwear 67 71
Handling 69 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Force Sport COMP-2

Ecsta PA51

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryg-Force Sport COMP-2Ecsta PA51ΔBoth?
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Other 62% #6/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 67% #11/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires −5.1 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 10% #20/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 67% #7/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires −57.2 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Sport COMP-2

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Ecsta PA51

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
  • Some reports of increased road noise over time
  • Limited availability in certain niche sizes
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 B · Kumho Ecsta PA51
CategoryHigh Performance Summer tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—13
Rim diameters—16″ – 19″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″10.5/32″
UTQG340 AA A500 A A
Treadwear warranty—45,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2

Kumho Ecsta PA51

Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 and Kumho Ecsta PA51 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 is stronger on wet and handling. Kumho Ecsta PA51 is stronger on noise and treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 69 vs 65 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 71 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 71 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 69 vs 66 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PA51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

69

Narrow edge

g-Force Sport COMP-2

Amazon