Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 27 road tests and 1 + 6,665 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 S is ahead, 84–68
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 86 · 6,665 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
“A note about the pilot sport 4 S: in cold weather (below 5 degrees) even if it isn't icy, the tyre compound hardens and has dramatically reduced grip. They are excellent summer tyres though, good in the wet too. These days I run Uniroyal rainsport 5 and they're very good.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 S +2593Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 95 Reviews found online 68 92 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 91.5 = 93
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 S +1788Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 72 91 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 90.5 = 88
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Comfort
Pilot Sport 4 S +1478Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 63 84 g-Force Sport COMP-2: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64
Pilot Sport 4 S: 40% × 70.4 + 60% × 83.5 = 78
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests – 70 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 S +572Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 70 Reviews found online 63 74 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 62% 62% g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.8 = 67
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 74.1 = 72
-
68
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 4 S +2290Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Pilot Sport 4 S Reviews found online 68 90 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source g-Force Sport COMP-2 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 84 |
| Dry | 68 | 93 |
| Wet | 71 | 88 |
| Comfort | 64 | 78 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 90 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
g-Force Sport COMP-2
84
/ 100
Pilot Sport 4 S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Pilot Sport 4 S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% | 62% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #20/22 | #1/22 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Sport COMP-2
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Pilot Sport 4 S
Pros
- Exceptional grip and predictable handling in both dry and wet conditions
- Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort compared to competitors and run-flats
- Sharper steering response and improved cornering stability
Cons
- High initial purchase price
- Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers and track users
- Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly vague or laggy initial response during rapid steering transitions
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S as a benchmark max-performance summer tire, praising its outstanding dry and wet grip, stability, and daily driving refinement. Common criticisms focus on its premium price, rapid tread wear on high-powered heavy vehicles or hot track sessions, and significantly reduced grip in cold weather. Many enthusiasts consider it an ideal street tire, though some note softer sidewalls compared to predecessors or recommend dedicated track tires for hard circuit driving.
rennlist.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by gcurnew I got the Goodyear F1s on my car when delivered and found them surprisingly nice: good grip, quiet, compliant ride. Put PS4Ss on last year and while I'm happy with them, they are a tad noisier than the F1s with a slightly stiffer ride and no apparent difference in grip or handling. I know the Michelins are the "go to" tire and pretty much everyone raves about them...but I'm in the camp that thinks the F1s are an equivalent tire. Having had both, I would have just bought a set of F1 rears (my fronts were only partially worn) rather than a full set of Michelins. I've used Michelin exclusively for the past two decades. My car came with the F1s and was pleasantly surprised. Dare I say better than 4S? Excellent in the wet and dry and they don't seem to get greasy like the 4Ss can when pushed. Still don't know how they wear but unless performance drops off or noise suddenly goes up like with Pirellis, I might buy them again.”
uk-polos.net
·2021-09-21
“If you can burn through a set of rock hard Bridgestones in 8k miles then you must be driving like a nutter. Most will see 20k miles on the fronts. You also talk about "throwing" the car around. If you're flinging the car around, I think you'd find the car a lot more predictable on 4 tyres of the same type rather than those on the front axle being a lot gripper than those on the rear axle. I'd recommend 35psi fronts and 33psi backs, if you were running 4 x PS4s. Back end stability is a little way off the likes of a Golf GTI when you start flinging it around - rear axle grip for both wheels on a bend would be far better with multilink rear suspension (which the Polo doesn't have). I've momentarily lost the back end once when I had all Bridgestones on. My 2018 Polo GTI went tail happy doing some moderate acceleration out of a large roundabout (so large it was almost straight) when I had 4000.miles on - bone dry road on a warm day. In the outside lane, a Golf GTD gunned it at twice my rate of acceleration, with no drama. That was the incident that made me decide to ditch the Bridgestones for PS4s.”
r/RZ34
·1 upvote ·2026-10-08
“I got 30k miles out of the pilot sport 4s and pilot sport all season 4. The cost difference was not too bad and the all season 4 grip almost as well and are rated to 11f vs 40f for the pilot sport 4s. And they all wore evenly. Upsizing definitely made it feel more planted 245 275.”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Track day durability#High price vs alternatives#Tread life and wear#Cold weather performance#Sidewall stiffness and comfort
Based on 208 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 110 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | 300 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
84
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 93 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 88 vs 71 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 78 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 88 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 93 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 78 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology