Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Toyo Open Country WT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 18 + 0 road tests and 30 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force Winter 2 leads, 79–75 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

Tests 78 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 30 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Open Country WT +6
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests63≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7879

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 78.1 = 69

    Open Country WT: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 84

    Wet

    g-Force Winter 2 +5
    79
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests85≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online8483

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 83.9 = 84

    Open Country WT: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 79

    No road tests of wet for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 88

    Snow

    g-Force Winter 2 +16
    72
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests93≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8274

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 93 + 40% × 81.6 = 88

    Open Country WT: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    g-Force Winter 2 +2
    73
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8277

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 82.2 = 75

    Open Country WT: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Open Country WT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 77

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests83–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for g-Force Winter 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    g-Force Winter 2 +2
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests71≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7675

    g-Force Winter 2: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 75.6 = 73

    Open Country WT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 82

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force Winter 2 +2
    80
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Winter 2Open Country WT
    Reviews found online8280
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Toyo Open Country WT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2Toyo Open Country WT
Relative Score 79 75
Dry 69 75
Wet 84 79
Snow 88 72
Comfort 75 73
Noise 77 –
Treadwear 73 71
Handling (owners) 82 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Force Winter 2

Open Country WT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryg-Force Winter 2Open Country WTΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/10 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test R18 #5/8 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Winter 2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
  • Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
  • Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
  • Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Winter 2 review

Tire B Open Country WT

Pros

  • Exceptional performance and traction in snow, ice, slush, and wet weather
  • Surprising longevity and slow tread wear over high mileage (20,000 to 30,000 miles)
  • Good versatility and capability for light off-road use, unmade tracks, and muddy fields

Cons

  • Slightly increased road noise compared to standard road tires, though not overly intrusive
All owner themes in the Open Country WT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 B · Toyo Open Country WT
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available758
Rim diameters14″ – 20″16″ – 19″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2

Toyo Open Country WT

Narrow edge: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better snow and wet. Pick the Toyo Open Country WT if dry matters most to you. Toyo Open Country WT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 88 vs 72 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Open Country WT scores 75 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 84 vs 79 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · Toyo Open Country WT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Winter 2 or Open Country WT?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Winter 2 or Open Country WT?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 84 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Winter 2 or Open Country WT?

Toyo Open Country WT, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, g-Force Winter 2 or Open Country WT?

BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2, 88 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Winter 2 or Open Country WT?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Winter 2 or Open Country WT?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology