Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 122 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 122 + 218 owner reviews. How we score
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 is ahead, 72–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +1457Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 73 51 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
76
Wet
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +1759Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 78 54 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 76
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59
No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +961Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 69 56 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 70
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61
No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
69
Comfort
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +1653Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 69 46 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.6 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 66 – Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66
No road tests of noise for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +1455Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 72 48 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 69
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison48Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro AT2 Reviews found online – 48
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 | Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 58 |
| Dry | 71 | 57 |
| Wet | 76 | 59 |
| Snow | 70 | 61 |
| Comfort | 69 | 53 |
| Noise | 66 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
58
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Pros
- Outstanding off-road and mud traction
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
- Impressive tread wear and longevity
Cons
- Do not perform quite as well as dedicated road tires during on-road driving
Tire B Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Dynapro AT2 line is divided, heavily dependent on whether users evaluate the OEM factory tire or the retail/Xtreme version. The standard OEM AT2 receives notable criticism for lacking true all-terrain capability, poor wet/winter grip, and premature wear, while highway comfort and quietness are praised. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for strong snow traction, improved wet performance, durability, and quiet road manners.
f150lightningforum.com
·2025-03-08
“I’ve had the Hankook Dynapro AT2s on another truck and their Dynapro AS on my Expedition. Both were terrible, even dangerous. Got rid of them early on both vehicles. My Lightning came with the General Grabbers. The Grabbers are decent, actually handle snow and wet very well, but are worthless for slush and ice. They’re not good on dirt. But I’ve kept them on now for a bit over 2 years. I’ll be replacing them before next winter as it will be about time anyway. Definitely want to go with something a bit more aggressive or winter-capable, just not sure which tires as of yet. Can’t really afford to sacrifice any range… Maybe just a tiny bit is all.”
r/TyreReviews
·1 upvote ·2023-03-21
“I just got the extreme at2 and they are awesome and quiet. Did go on an easy/moderate off-road in Broken Bow, OK and they did outstanding!”
f150forum.com
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
Top themes
#OEM versus retail differences#Wet traction and braking#Winter and snow performance#Highway noise and comfort#Tread life and durability#Dynapro AT2 Xtreme upgrades
Based on 56 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 | B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 27 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 18/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 45 - 80 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
58
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Winner: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 76 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 69 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 71 vs 57 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 69 vs 55 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro AT2?
Which is better in the wet, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro AT2?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 76 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro AT2?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 71 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro AT2?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 70 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro AT2?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 69 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro AT2?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 69 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology