tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 122 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 72, DynaPro A/TM RF10 71.

Check price on Amazon · Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7577

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 72

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7875

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 75

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6962

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7175

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6673

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7175

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online7771
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 72 73
Wet 75 74
Snow 69 65
Comfort 70 72
Noise 67 70
Treadwear 69 71
Handling (owners) 77 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

Pros

  • Outstanding off-road and mud traction
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Impressive tread wear and longevity

Cons

  • Do not perform quite as well as dedicated road tires during on-road driving
All owner themes in the Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2729
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth18/32″13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallRaised Black LetteringOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure45 - 80 psi44 psi
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Too close to call: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 is stronger on handling and snow. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 69 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 70 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 69 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology