tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 vs Yokohama Geolandar G900 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 122 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 is ahead, 72–66

Check price on Amazon · Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Geolandar G900 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7568

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 72

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7871

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 75

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6961

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 69

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 64

    No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7160

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Geolandar G900. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online66–

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7161

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM3Geolandar G900
    Reviews found online7762
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3Yokohama Geolandar G900
Relative Score 72 66
Dry 72 68
Wet 75 70
Snow 69 64
Comfort 70 65
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 69 63
Handling (owners) 77 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

Geolandar G900

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

Pros

  • Outstanding off-road and mud traction
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Impressive tread wear and longevity

Cons

  • Do not perform quite as well as dedicated road tires during on-road driving
All owner themes in the Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 review

Tire B Geolandar G900

Pros

  • Excellent all-terrain versatility including snow, gravel, and mud
  • Predictable and secure handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort compared to stiffer premium alternatives

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with many reports of premature wear
  • High road noise levels, particularly on motorways
  • High price point relative to current market competitors
All owner themes in the Geolandar G900 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
CategoryMud-Terrain tireWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available272
Rim diameters16″ – 20″16″ – 17″
Tread depth18/32″—
SidewallRaised Black Lettering—
Max pressure45 - 80 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3

Yokohama Geolandar G900

Winner: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 77 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 69 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 75 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 69 vs 64 on snow.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Geolandar G900?

Which is better in the wet, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Geolandar G900?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 75 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Geolandar G900?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 72 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Geolandar G900?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 69 vs 64 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Geolandar G900?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Geolandar G900?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 69 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology