tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 100 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Trail-Terrain T/A is ahead, 71–64

Check price on Amazon · Trail-Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Trail-Terrain T/A +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7659

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Trail-Terrain T/A +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6967

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 77

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)–
    Reviews found online82–

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 77

    No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Trail-Terrain T/A +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6961

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Trail-Terrain T/A +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7565

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 71

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Trail-Terrain T/A +12
    57
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ADynapro HP
    Reviews found online6957
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/AHankook Dynapro HP
Relative Score 71 64
Dry 73 62
Wet 69 68
Snow 77 –
Comfort 69 65
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 71 65
Handling (owners) 69 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Trail-Terrain T/A

Dynapro HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain tire
  • Excellent traction and predictability in snow and winter conditions
  • Good ride comfort and smoothness on paved roads

Cons

  • Some users report poor wet weather traction and rear-wheel slippage
  • A minority of reviewers noted high noise levels on paved tarmac
  • Concerns regarding longevity with some users experiencing faster tread wear
All owner themes in the Trail-Terrain T/A review

Tire B Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A B · Hankook Dynapro HP
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available5014
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 18″
Tread depth11 - 13/32″—
UTQG660 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

Hankook Dynapro HP

Winner: BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 69 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 73 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 71 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Trail-Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP?

Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 73 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 71 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology