Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 102 reviews
Michelin Defender looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Michelin Defender — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 102 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) – Reviews found online 82 – Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 64 – Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 69 – Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Defender Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 75 – Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Defender Reviews found online 64 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | Michelin Defender |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | – |
| Dry | 71 | – |
| Wet | 65 | – |
| Snow | 77 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | – |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Trail-Terrain T/A
–
/ 100
Defender
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A
Pros
- Low road noise for an all-terrain tire, with several reviewers calling it quieter than previous tires such as the AT3 and other all-terrains
- Strong snow and ice performance, including a Colorado snowstorm and multiple Alps trips with up to a foot of snow
- Comfortable, smooth ride and good handling and braking on the road
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction reported by several reviewers, including wheelspin, lack of confidence on wet roads and ABS activation issues
- Some reviewers found road noise high on paved surfaces, and one called it outrageously noisy, though others found it quiet
- Wear is faster for some owners, with one set nearing replacement after about 20,000 miles and two years
Tire B Defender
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and quiet operation
- Strong tread life and durability over several years
- Reliable grip on dry pavement
Cons
- Susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain
- Limited traction in deep or severe snow
- Audible squealing during aggressive dry-pavement acceleration
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | B · Michelin Defender |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 50 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11 - 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 660 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
–
/ 100
Michelin Defender
Only BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Tire B · Michelin Defender
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology