Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 19 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Urban Terrain T/A is ahead, 73–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Urban Terrain T/A +1063Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 76 61 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73
C Drive2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63
No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
Urban Terrain T/A +867Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 77 66 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75
C Drive2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67
No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 67 – Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68
No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
Urban Terrain T/A +468Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 74 66 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 72
C Drive2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A or C Drive2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Urban Terrain T/A +962Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A C Drive2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 74 60 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 71
C Drive2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Urban Terrain T/A +1361Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A C Drive2 Reviews found online 74 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A | Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 64 |
| Dry | 73 | 63 |
| Wet | 75 | 67 |
| Snow | 68 | – |
| Comfort | 72 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Urban Terrain T/A
64
/ 100
C Drive2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Urban Terrain T/A
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability across various vehicle types.
- Strong traction and confidence in winter conditions, including snow and slush.
- Reliable off-road capability on loose surfaces like mud, wet grass, and gravel.
Cons
- Higher levels of road noise compared to standard highway or OEM tires.
- Noticeable impact on fuel efficiency for some users.
- Not intended for high-speed, performance-oriented driving.
Tire B C Drive2
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
- Low road noise levels
- Strong wet weather performance for most users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
- Sudden loss of grip at the limit
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A | B · Yokohama C Drive2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | 3 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
64
/ 100
Yokohama C Drive2
Winner: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 73 vs 63 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 67 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Urban Terrain T/A or C Drive2?
Which is better in the wet, Urban Terrain T/A or C Drive2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Urban Terrain T/A or C Drive2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Urban Terrain T/A or C Drive2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Urban Terrain T/A or C Drive2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology