Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 47 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 10 in 2011 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone A001 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
A001 is ahead, 69–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 273 reviews
Best test result: #8 of 9 in 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 (overall ranking)
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
A001 +2547Why this score
Source A001 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 75 36 -
76
Wet
A001 +2254Why this score
Source A001 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 78 49 -
53
Snow
Crugen HP71 +457Why this score
Source A001 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 42 48 -
69
Comfort
A001 +1455Why this score
Source A001 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 69 40 -
–
Noise
No comparison57Why this score
Source A001 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online – 43 -
68
Treadwear
A001 +2444Why this score
Source A001 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 70 30 -
71
Handling
A001 +1655Why this score
Source A001 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 71 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone A001 | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 51 |
| Dry | 72 | 47 |
| Wet | 76 | 54 |
| Snow | 53 | 57 |
| Comfort | 69 | 55 |
| Noise | – | 57 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 44 |
| Handling | 71 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
A001
51
/ 100
Crugen HP71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | A001 | Crugen HP71 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/10 · 2011 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 22% #8/9 · 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | −2.2 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A A001
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
- Strong performance in cold temperatures, snow, and slush
- Impressive tread life and durability compared to standard summer tires
Cons
- Increased road noise, particularly as the tire wears
- Minor reduction in fuel efficiency (approx. 1-4%)
- Occasional reports of vague handling or instability under specific emergency braking conditions
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone A001
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinion on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is heavily mixed, largely split between appreciation for its comfortable, quiet ride and affordability compared to premium brands, versus frequent complaints about rapid tread wear, particularly on heavier electric vehicles. While many drivers praise initial grip, handling, and value, concerns persist regarding longevity, internal acoustic foam separation issues, and premature wear relative to advertised mileage warranties.
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2025-11-19
“Kumho Crugen HP71 Hello! Was quoted $1000 flat for 4 235/60r18 tires including alignment and road hazard. Wanted to know if thats a good/fair price? Thank you!”
r/CadillacLyriq
·4 upvotes ·2026-09-20
“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”
r/volvoc40
·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08
“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”
Top themes
#Tread wear and longevity#Ride comfort and noise#EV performance and weight#Pricing and value#Acoustic foam issues#Handling and traction
Based on 34 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone A001 | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 63 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Bridgestone A001
51
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: Bridgestone A001 — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone A001 scores 72 vs 47 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone A001 scores 68 vs 44 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone A001 scores 76 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone A001 scores 71 vs 55 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone A001
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.