tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Continental ContiCrossContact LX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 35 owner reviews. How we score

Alenza AS Ultra is ahead, 65–57

Check price on Amazon · Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Alenza AS Ultra +9
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6551

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Alenza AS Ultra +10
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6955

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Alenza AS Ultra +10
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6953

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 70

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Alenza AS Ultra +8
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6251

    Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64

    ContiCrossContact LX: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.5 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    ContiCrossContact LX +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5660

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 62

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Alenza AS Ultra +2
    52
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraContiCrossContact LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online4643

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 54

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Alenza AS Ultra +16
    47
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraContiCrossContact LX
    Reviews found online6347
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Alenza AS UltraContinental ContiCrossContact LX
Relative Score 65 57
Dry 66 57
Wet 69 59
Snow 70 60
Comfort 64 56
Noise 62 64
Treadwear 54 52
Handling (owners) 63 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Alenza AS Ultra

± 7

ContiCrossContact LX

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Alenza AS Ultra

Pros

  • Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
  • Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
  • Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
  • Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
  • Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
All owner themes in the Alenza AS Ultra review

Tire B ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra B · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available464
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG800 A A680 A B
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi65,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

Winner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better handling, wet and snow. Where the Continental ContiCrossContact LX is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 63 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 69 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 66 vs 57 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX?

Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 69 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 66 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 64 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or ContiCrossContact LX?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 52 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology