tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Alenza AS Ultra on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7277

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7375

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Alenza AS Ultra +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7162

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6173

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5975

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6971
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Alenza AS UltraHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 69 71
Dry 70 73
Wet 72 74
Snow 70 65
Comfort 69 72
Noise 65 70
Treadwear 62 71
Handling (owners) 69 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Alenza AS Ultra

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Alenza AS Ultra

Pros

  • Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
  • Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
  • Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
  • Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
  • Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
All owner themes in the Alenza AS Ultra review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4629
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″13/32″
UTQG800 A A560 A B
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common1111

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, noise and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if snow matters most to you. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 70 vs 65 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology