Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport vs Pirelli Angel GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport 70, Angel GT 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Level71Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 72 72 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 71
Angel GT: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Angel GT +374Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 72 76 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 71
Angel GT: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74
No road tests of wet for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Comfort
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport +170Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 73 71 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 72.7 = 71
Angel GT: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.8 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Angel GT +266Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 62 66 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
Angel GT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport +272Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Angel GT Reviews found online 74 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport | Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 71 | 71 |
| Wet | 71 | 74 |
| Comfort | 71 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Angel GT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Pros
- Excellent confidence and stability in varied road conditions
- Strong performance in both wet and dry weather
- Effective absorption of road bumps and irregularities
Cons
- Lack of feedback and feel at higher lean angles
- Tendency to square off during long-distance or motorway riding
- Performance limits are reached quickly during aggressive, high-speed riding
Tire B Angel GT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up times
- Enhances rider confidence and offers great handling performance
Cons
- Lower than expected mileage and rapid wear reported by some users
- Front tire shoulder wear issues on heavier sport-touring bikes if the correct 'A' spec is not used
- Handling and tracking complaints on certain lighter or specific bike models compared to stock tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport | B · Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Pirelli Angel GT
Too close to call: Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport and Pirelli Angel GT are within 2 points overall. Pirelli Angel GT is stronger on wet. Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Angel GT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 74 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Angel GT?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Angel GT?
Pirelli Angel GT, 74 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Angel GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Angel GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Angel GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology