tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Blizzak DM-V2 72, DynaPro A/TM RF10 71.

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak DM-V2 Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak DM-V2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7077

    Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Blizzak DM-V2 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak DM-V2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7775

    Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 79

    Snow

    Blizzak DM-V2 +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak DM-V2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8562

    Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 74.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.7 = 79

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak DM-V2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7275

    Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak DM-V2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7173

    Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak DM-V2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6275

    Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak DM-V2 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak DM-V2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online7771
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak DM-V2Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 69 73
Wet 75 74
Snow 79 65
Comfort 71 72
Noise 69 70
Treadwear 64 71
Handling (owners) 77 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak DM-V2

DynaPro A/TM RF10

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak DM-V2DynaPro A/TM RF10ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/8 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak DM-V2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
  • High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
  • Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
  • Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
All owner themes in the Blizzak DM-V2 review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryWinterAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available7329
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth13/32″13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common2020

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is stronger on snow and handling. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on treadwear and dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 79 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2, 79 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak DM-V2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology