Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 7 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 vs Cooper Zeon LTZ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Blizzak LM25 4X4 and Zeon LTZ are level at 62.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Blizzak LM25 4X4 +162Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 60 58 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 63
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 62
No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
Zeon LTZ +666Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 56 64 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 66
No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Blizzak LM25 4X4 +2047Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 65 30 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 47
No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
Zeon LTZ +660Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 47 56 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.2 = 54
Zeon LTZ: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.4 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
Zeon LTZ +464Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 49 60 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 60
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Zeon LTZ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Zeon LTZ +466Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 59 65 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
Zeon LTZ +464Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Zeon LTZ Reviews found online 60 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Cooper Zeon LTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 62 |
| Dry | 63 | 62 |
| Wet | 60 | 66 |
| Snow | 67 | 47 |
| Comfort | 54 | 60 |
| Noise | 60 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Blizzak LM25 4X4
Zeon LTZ
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM25 4X4
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and severe winter conditions
- Good stability and control on dry and mixed winter roads
- Sporty handling feel and low noise in dry weather
Cons
- Extremely slippery performance on wet and cold roads
- High noise levels reported by some users
- Potential performance reduction if tires are aged during storage before installation
Tire B Zeon LTZ
Pros
- Comfortable and smooth highway ride quality
- Aggressive, attractive aesthetic that suits sport utility vehicles
- Good longevity and treadwear, with multiple users reporting up to 50,000 miles of use
Cons
- Poor traction in snow, ice, and deep sand
- Limited availability and sourcing difficulties
- Occasional reports of premature failure or punctures from dissatisfied users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | B · Cooper Zeon LTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 520 A B |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
Cooper Zeon LTZ
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 and Cooper Zeon LTZ are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 is stronger on snow. Cooper Zeon LTZ is stronger on wet, comfort and noise. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Cooper Zeon LTZ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 scores 67 vs 47 on snow.
Cooper Zeon LTZ scores 66 vs 60 on wet.
Cooper Zeon LTZ scores 60 vs 54 on comfort.
Cooper Zeon LTZ scores 64 vs 60 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Zeon LTZ?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Zeon LTZ?
Cooper Zeon LTZ, 66 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Zeon LTZ?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Zeon LTZ?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4, 67 vs 47 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Zeon LTZ?
Cooper Zeon LTZ, 64 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Zeon LTZ?
Cooper Zeon LTZ, 60 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Zeon LTZ?
Cooper Zeon LTZ, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology