tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 5 road tests and 2 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i cept evo2 leads, 69–67 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Winter i cept evo2 or Blizzak LM80 EVO on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO
Tire ABridgestone

Blizzak LM80 EVO

Winter

± 9Provisional

Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 68 · 2 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test (noise)

Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Tire BHankook

Winter i cept evo2

Winter

± 6

Tests 67 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo2 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6465
    Reviews found online7171

    Blizzak LM80 EVO: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 70.6 = 66

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 64.8 + 40% × 70.8 = 67

  2. 64

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo2 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6370
    Reviews found online6773

    Blizzak LM80 EVO: 60% × 62.6 + 40% × 67.3 = 64

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 71

  3. 72

    Snow

    Blizzak LM80 EVO +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests7372
    Reviews found online≈ 71 (est.)66

    Blizzak LM80 EVO: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 71.2 (est.) = 72

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 66.1 = 70

    No owner ratings of snow for Blizzak LM80 EVO. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Winter i cept evo2 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6471

    Blizzak LM80 EVO: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.9 = 65

    Winter i cept evo2: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM80 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Winter i cept evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 72

    Noise

    Blizzak LM80 EVO +17
    55
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7647
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Blizzak LM80 EVO: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 47.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 55

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak LM80 EVO or Winter i cept evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–67
    Reviews found online–73

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 72.8 = 70

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i cept evo2 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2
    Reviews found online6673
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    Blizzak LM80 EVO +8
    59
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests6759
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVOHankook Winter i cept evo2
Relative Score 67 69
Dry 66 67
Wet 64 71
Snow 72 70
Comfort 65 70
Noise 72 55
Treadwear – 70
Handling (owners) 66 73
Efficiency 67 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

Blizzak LM80 EVO

± 6

Winter i cept evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM80 EVOWinter i cept evo2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #9/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 91% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #4/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 98% #7/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 93% #7/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 93% #9/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 86% #8/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 96% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 93% #8/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 98% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 100% #1/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 97% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 98% #6/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 99% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 93% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 87% #5/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 78% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 45% #6/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test 75% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #6/9 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test #5/11 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM80 EVO

Pros

  • Strong performance in snow and alpine conditions
  • Reliable grip on dry surfaces
  • Capable handling on unpaved or rough roads

Cons

  • Increased road noise compared to summer tires
  • Occasional traction loss in cold, wet conditions
  • Perceived lack of premium refinement
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM80 EVO review

Tire B Winter i cept evo2

Pros

  • Impressive grip and traction on snow and ice
  • High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Good value for money compared to higher-priced premium alternatives

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls or goofy feel on dry roads, particularly in warmer winter temperatures
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly as the tire ages over multiple seasons
  • Can struggle to put down high torque/power on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3479
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO

Hankook Winter i cept evo2

Narrow edge: Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO if noise and efficiency matter most to you. Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO scores 72 vs 55 on noise.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO scores 67 vs 59 on efficiency.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 71 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 73 vs 66 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM80 EVO or Winter i cept evo2?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM80 EVO or Winter i cept evo2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 71 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM80 EVO or Winter i cept evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM80 EVO or Winter i cept evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM80 EVO or Winter i cept evo2?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO, 72 vs 55 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM80 EVO or Winter i cept evo2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which rolls more easily, Blizzak LM80 EVO or Winter i cept evo2?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO, 67 vs 59 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology