Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 63 · 21 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 21 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Winter i cept evo2 SUV leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Blizzak WS90 +469Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 85 69 Reviews found online 54 69 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.1 = 73
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 68.6 + 40% × 68.7 = 69
-
67
Wet
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +370Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 66 71 Reviews found online 69 69 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.5 = 67
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 68.7 = 70
-
73
Snow
Level73Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 69 74 Reviews found online 79 71 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 78.5 = 73
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 71 = 73
-
61
Comfort
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +667Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 69 72 Reviews found online 55 64 Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 55.2 = 61
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 40% × 72.1 + 60% × 64.2 = 67
-
63
Noise
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +669Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 71 Reviews found online 51 ≈ 66 (est.) Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 51.1 = 63
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +667Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 58 67 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i cept evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +567Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Winter i cept evo2 SUV Reviews found online 62 67 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison61Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 70 |
| Dry | 73 | 69 |
| Wet | 67 | 70 |
| Snow | 73 | 73 |
| Comfort | 61 | 67 |
| Noise | 63 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 67 |
| Efficiency | – | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak WS90
Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak WS90 | Winter i cept evo2 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 94% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 79% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 93% #5/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 70% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 97% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 85% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 100% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling (tester's mark) | Snow | 55% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 90% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 94% #10/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 90% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | #6/11 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak WS90
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
Tire B Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 45 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 15″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Narrow edge: Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV — better comfort, noise and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if dry matters most to you. Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 67 vs 61 on comfort.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 69 vs 63 on noise.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 67 vs 61 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 69 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 67 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 67 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology