Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 10 reviews
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Continental Cross Contact A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Cross Contact A/T leads, 62–60 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Cross Contact A/T +464Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 56 62 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
63
Wet
Cross Contact A/T +164Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 61 63 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 63
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
55
Snow
Dueler H/T 689 +253Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 45 41 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
63
Comfort
Cross Contact A/T +265Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 60 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 63
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 689 or Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 58 – Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Cross Contact A/T +465Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 58 64 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 61
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Cross Contact A/T +362Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Cross Contact A/T Reviews found online 59 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 62 |
| Dry | 60 | 64 |
| Wet | 63 | 64 |
| Snow | 55 | 53 |
| Comfort | 63 | 65 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 61 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dueler H/T 689
Cross Contact A/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/T 689
Pros
- Exceptional tread life exceeding expected mileage with regular rotation
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Reliable grip and performance in rain and snow
Cons
- Slippery performance and poor handling on gravel roads
- Can be noisy on certain road surfaces
- Some users report a bouncy ride quality during travel
Tire B Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | B · Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season Premium Touring tires | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 6 | — |
| Rim diameters | 8″ – 16″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 180 B A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Narrow edge: Continental Cross Contact A/T — better dry and treadwear. Where the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 60 on dry.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 61 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/T 689 or Cross Contact A/T?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 689 or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 689 or Cross Contact A/T?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 689 or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 53 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 689 or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 689 or Cross Contact A/T?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology