Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 79–54

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689

Dueler H/T 689

All-Season Premium Touring tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 10 reviews

Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire BMichelin

Defender LTX M/S

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 83 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    Defender LTX M/S +25
    79
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 689Defender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online4784

    Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 54

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.4 = 79

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Defender LTX M/S +25
    82
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 689Defender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 79 (est.)
    Reviews found online5286

    Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 79 (est.) + 40% × 85.7 = 82

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 54

    Snow

    Defender LTX M/S +20
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 689Defender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online4277

    Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 54

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    Defender LTX M/S +23
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 689Defender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4478

    Dueler H/T 689: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 43.6 = 52

    Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 689Defender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 60

    No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 53

    Treadwear

    Defender LTX M/S +27
    80
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 689Defender LTX M/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 59 (est.)75
    Reviews found online4586

    Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 53

    Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 86.3 = 80

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Defender LTX M/S +31
    82
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 689Defender LTX M/S
    Reviews found online5182
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/T 689Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Relative Score 54 79
Dry 54 79
Wet 57 82
Snow 54 74
Comfort 52 75
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 53 80
Handling (owners) 51 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dueler H/T 689

± 7

Defender LTX M/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler H/T 689

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life exceeding expected mileage with regular rotation
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Reliable grip and performance in rain and snow

Cons

  • Slippery performance and poor handling on gravel roads
  • Can be noisy on certain road surfaces
  • Some users report a bouncy ride quality during travel
All owner themes in the Dueler H/T 689 review

Tire B Defender LTX M/S

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, often exceeding 60,000 miles
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride quality
  • Strong traction and secure handling in wet, dry, and moderate snow conditions

Cons

  • High initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Subpar off-road performance, specifically struggling in mud, sand, and loose gravel
  • Limited ice performance compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Defender LTX M/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
CategoryAll-Season Premium Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available6—
Rim diameters8″ – 16″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG180 B A720 - 800 B A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689

Michelin Defender LTX M/S

Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
Tire B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 82 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?

Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 80 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology