Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 10 reviews
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 78–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 82 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +2378Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 47 83 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 78
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
57
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +2481Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 78 (est.) Reviews found online 52 84 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Defender LTX M/S +2174Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 43 76 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 53
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 74
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
53
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S +2275Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 45 78 Dueler H/T 689: 40% × 64.6 (est.) + 60% × 44.5 = 53
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.6 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 51 – Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 60
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +2679Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 45 85 Dueler H/T 689: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 85.1 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 689. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
52
Handling (owners)
Defender LTX M/S +2880Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 689 Defender LTX M/S Reviews found online 52 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 78 |
| Dry | 55 | 78 |
| Wet | 57 | 81 |
| Snow | 53 | 74 |
| Comfort | 53 | 75 |
| Noise | 60 | – |
| Treadwear | 53 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dueler H/T 689
Defender LTX M/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/T 689
Pros
- Exceptional tread life exceeding expected mileage with regular rotation
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Reliable grip and performance in rain and snow
Cons
- Slippery performance and poor handling on gravel roads
- Can be noisy on certain road surfaces
- Some users report a bouncy ride quality during travel
Tire B Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and mileage lifespan
- Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds
- Strong year-round traction across dry, wet, and light snow conditions
Cons
- High upfront purchase price
- Subpar performance in deep mud, sand, and off-road environments
- Limited ice and severe winter capability compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season Premium Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 6 | — |
| Rim diameters | 8″ – 16″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 180 B A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 80 vs 52 on handling.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 53 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 81 vs 57 on wet.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 78 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 81 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 689 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology