tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 75 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy 4S is ahead, 68–54

Check price on Amazon · Kinergy 4S or Ecopia EP150 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire BHankook

Kinergy 4S

All Season

± 8

Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    Kinergy 4S +15
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 59 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4667

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 67.2 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Kinergy 4S +15
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 61 (est.)74
    Reviews found online5371

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 48

    Snow

    Kinergy 4S +22
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 59 (est.)66
    Reviews found online3377

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 32.9 = 48

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 76.6 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Kinergy 4S +13
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4766

    Ecopia EP150: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 47 = 54

    Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    Level
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)56
    Reviews found online49≈ 66 (est.)

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 60

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 60

    No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP150. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    Kinergy 4S +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 60 (est.)63
    Reviews found online4863

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55

    Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.8 + 40% × 62.9 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 50

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy 4S +14
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Kinergy 4S
    Reviews found online5064
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Kinergy 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–67
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP150Hankook Kinergy 4S
Relative Score 54 68
Dry 54 69
Wet 58 73
Snow 48 70
Comfort 54 67
Noise 60 60
Treadwear 55 63
Handling (owners) 50 64
Efficiency – 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecopia EP150

± 8

Kinergy 4S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcopia EP150Kinergy 4SΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/16 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test #12/30 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP150

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
  • Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
  • Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving

Cons

  • Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
  • Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP150 review

Tire B Kinergy 4S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
  • Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
  • Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
  • Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 B · Hankook Kinergy 4S
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2467
Rim diameters13″ – 17″13″ – 18″
UTQG200 B B500 - 600 A A
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common1919

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Hankook Kinergy 4S

Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better snow, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 70 vs 48 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 69 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 73 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 64 vs 50 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP150 or Kinergy 4S?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP150 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 73 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP150 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 69 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP150 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 70 vs 48 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Ecopia EP150 or Kinergy 4S?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP150 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP150 or Kinergy 4S?

Hankook Kinergy 4S, 63 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology