Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Ecopia EP300 is ahead, 69–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Ecopia EP300 +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Reviews found online6858
  2. 71

    Wet

    Ecopia EP300 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Reviews found online7160
  3. 69

    Comfort

    Ecopia EP300 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Reviews found online6966
  4. 69

    Treadwear

    Ecopia EP300 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Reviews found online7164
  5. 69

    Handling

    Ecopia EP300 +11
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Reviews found online6958
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP300Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Relative Score 69 63
Dry 68 62
Wet 71 62
Comfort 69 68
Treadwear 69 65
Handling 69 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecopia EP300

Ecowing ES01 KH27

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP300

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy

Cons

  • Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
  • Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
  • Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP300 review

Tire B Ecowing ES01 KH27

Pros

  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
  • Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
  • Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES01 KH27 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available29—
Rim diameters15″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 71 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 68 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

69

Leads

Ecopia EP300

Amazon