Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 17 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecopia EP300 is ahead, 69–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 2,707 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Ecopia EP300 +662Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Reviews found online 68 58 -
71
Wet
Ecopia EP300 +962Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Reviews found online 71 60 -
69
Comfort
Ecopia EP300 +168Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Reviews found online 69 66 -
69
Treadwear
Ecopia EP300 +465Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Reviews found online 71 64 -
69
Handling
Ecopia EP300 +1158Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Reviews found online 69 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 63 |
| Dry | 68 | 62 |
| Wet | 71 | 62 |
| Comfort | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling | 69 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP300
Ecowing ES01 KH27
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B Ecowing ES01 KH27
Pros
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
- Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
- Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 58 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 71 vs 62 on wet.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 68 vs 62 on dry.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.