Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 2,712 + 9,959 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Ecowing ES01 KH27 64, Ecowing ES31 63.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecowing ES31
Tire BKumho

Ecowing ES31

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,959 reviews

“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Ecowing ES31 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6162

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Ecowing ES01 KH27 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6160

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Ecowing ES01 KH27 +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6661

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67

    Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    Ecowing ES31 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6465

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Ecowing ES01 KH27 +3
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecowing ES31
    Reviews found online5855
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecowing ES01 KH27Kumho Ecowing ES31
Relative Score 64 63
Dry 63 64
Wet 64 63
Comfort 67 63
Treadwear 65 66
Handling (owners) 58 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecowing ES01 KH27

± 8

Ecowing ES31

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcowing ES01 KH27Ecowing ES31ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/16 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 #9/18 2022 ADAC 16" SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecowing ES01 KH27

Pros

  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
  • Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
  • Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES01 KH27 review

Tire B Ecowing ES31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
  • Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance

Cons

  • Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
  • Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
  • Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES31 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecowing ES31

Mixed

The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.

Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability

Based on 12 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—39
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Kumho Ecowing ES31

Too close to call: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 and Kumho Ecowing ES31 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 is stronger on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 67 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Ecowing ES31?

Which is better in the wet, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Ecowing ES31?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 63 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Ecowing ES31?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Ecowing ES31?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology