tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 2,712 + 790 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip 2 SUV is ahead, 79–64

Check price on Amazon · EfficientGrip 2 SUV or Ecowing ES01 KH27 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Tire BGoodyear

EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Summer

± 5

Tests 81 · 5 tests Owners 79 · 790 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +16
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27EfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 65 (est.)77
    Reviews found online6181

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 81.4 = 79

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 64

    Wet

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +16
    80
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27EfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 65 (est.)81
    Reviews found online6179

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 81.4 + 40% × 78.9 = 80

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27EfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)79
    Reviews found online6674

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 40% × 78.9 + 60% × 73.7 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    82
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27EfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–92
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 92 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 82

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +16
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27EfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)82
    Reviews found online6480

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 80 = 81

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 58

    Handling (owners)

    EfficientGrip 2 SUV +18
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27EfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Reviews found online5876
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEcowing ES01 KH27EfficientGrip 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–75
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecowing ES01 KH27Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Relative Score 64 79
Dry 63 79
Wet 64 80
Comfort 67 76
Noise – 82
Treadwear 65 81
Handling (owners) 58 76
Efficiency – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecowing ES01 KH27

± 5

EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcowing ES01 KH27EfficientGrip 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/16 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 #3/8 2025 EV Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecowing ES01 KH27

Pros

  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
  • Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
  • Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES01 KH27 review

Tire B EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong and confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Impressive tread wear and long-term durability

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can compromise responsive handling and cornering feedback
  • Less effective performance in cold, freezing, or damp winter conditions
  • Lack of built-in rim protection
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip 2 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 B · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—41
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 76 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 79 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 80 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV scores 81 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecowing ES01 KH27 or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 80 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 79 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 76 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or EfficientGrip 2 SUV?

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV, 81 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology