Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 124 + 2,709 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 3 K125 is ahead, 78–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
± 5

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 75 · 124 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 53 in 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 85

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +22
    63
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests89≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7961

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 79.3 = 85

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +17
    63
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests82≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7761

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 77.2 = 80

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests76≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7266

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 40% × 75.9 + 60% × 72.4 = 74

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 75

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests80–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 3 K125. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests61≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7165

    Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 61 + 40% × 70.5 = 65

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 3 K125 +18
    57
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Reviews found online7557
  7. 66

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 3 K125Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests66–
Scores at a glance
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus Prime 3 K125Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Relative Score 78 63
Dry 85 63
Wet 80 63
Comfort 74 67
Noise 75 –
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 75 57
Efficiency 66 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ventus Prime 3 K125

± 8

Ecowing ES01 KH27

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 finished ahead 1 times and Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryVentus Prime 3 K125Ecowing ES01 KH27ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/47 #28/47 – 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview · 195/65 R15

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus Prime 3 K125

Pros

  • Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption

Cons

  • Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
  • Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
  • Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 3 K125 review

Tire B Ecowing ES01 KH27

Pros

  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
  • Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
  • Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES01 KH27 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available60—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 85 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 75 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 80 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 74 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 80 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 85 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 74 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime 3 K125 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology