Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 259 + 2,709 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta PS31 leads, 66–63 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 2,709 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Level63Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 60 61 Ecsta PS31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63
Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 63
No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
Ecsta PS31 +663Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 68 61 Ecsta PS31: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 63
No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
58
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 50 – Ecsta PS31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +167Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 66 Ecsta PS31: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66
Ecowing ES01 KH27: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS31 or Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 67 – Ecsta PS31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 65 Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65
Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Ecsta PS31 +1257Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Reviews found online 69 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS31 | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 63 |
| Dry | 63 | 63 |
| Wet | 69 | 63 |
| Snow | 58 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 67 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Ecsta PS31
63
/ 100
Ecowing ES01 KH27
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PS31
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
- Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
Tire B Ecowing ES01 KH27
Pros
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
- Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
- Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 21 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 460 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PS31
63
/ 100
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better handling and wet. Where the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 69 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 69 vs 63 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta PS31 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS31 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Kumho Ecsta PS31, 69 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS31 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS31 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS31 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology