Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 24 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Firestone Destination M/T2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 39 owner reviews. How we score
Destination M/T2 is ahead, 67–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 39 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
47
Dry
Destination M/T2 +2269Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Destination M/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 36 70 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 47
Destination M/T2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
53
Wet
Destination M/T2 +1871Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Destination M/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 47 72 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 53
Destination M/T2: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
54
Snow
Destination M/T2 +1670Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Destination M/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 43 71 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 54
Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
Destination M/T2 +1266Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Destination M/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 39 63 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 54
Destination M/T2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
Destination M/T2 +361Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Destination M/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 45 52 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 58
Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
Destination M/T2 +660Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Destination M/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 45 56 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 54
Destination M/T2: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
40
Handling (owners)
Destination M/T2 +2666Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Destination M/T2 Reviews found online 40 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Firestone Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 67 |
| Dry | 47 | 69 |
| Wet | 53 | 71 |
| Snow | 54 | 70 |
| Comfort | 54 | 66 |
| Noise | 58 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 40 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP422 Plus
Destination M/T2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting
Cons
- Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
- Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
- Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
Tire B Destination M/T2
Pros
- Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Good highway manners and stable handling
Cons
- Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
- Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
- Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Firestone Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 15 | 18 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 19/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Firestone Destination M/T2
Winner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 40 on handling.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 69 vs 47 on dry.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 53 on wet.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 70 vs 54 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 69 vs 47 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 70 vs 54 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 61 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 66 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Destination M/T2?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 60 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology