Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 24 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 171 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar G91AV is ahead, 70–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 171 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
47
Dry
Geolandar G91AV +2673Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 36 76 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 47
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 73
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
53
Wet
Geolandar G91AV +1568Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 47 67 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 53
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
54
Snow
Geolandar G91AV +1569Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 43 68 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 54
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
54
Comfort
Geolandar G91AV +1771Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 39 74 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 54
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
Geolandar G91AV +1068Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 45 70 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 58
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
Geolandar G91AV +1569Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 45 71 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 54
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
40
Handling (owners)
Geolandar G91AV +3676Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Reviews found online 40 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 70 |
| Dry | 47 | 73 |
| Wet | 53 | 68 |
| Snow | 54 | 69 |
| Comfort | 54 | 71 |
| Noise | 58 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 40 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP422 Plus
Geolandar G91AV
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting
Cons
- Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
- Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
- Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
Tire B Geolandar G91AV
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on highways and city streets
- Reliable traction and confident handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good overall durability and tread longevity for daily commuting
Cons
- Occasional reports of reduced grip or lateral sliding during aggressive cornering in heavy rain
- Some complaints regarding premature tread wear and lack of manufacturer warranty support
- Subpar dry traction and wheel-spin reported by select Forester owners
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 15 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 17″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 280 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 76 vs 40 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 73 vs 47 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 71 vs 54 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 68 vs 53 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 68 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 73 vs 47 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 69 vs 54 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 68 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 71 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology