tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 25 + 1,929 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 90–74

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Potenza Adrenalin RE004 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Summer

± 4

Tests 93 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,929 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +19
    94
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 30 tests≈ 73 (est.)96
    Reviews found online7991

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 91.1 = 94

    No road tests of dry for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +17
    92
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests≈ 74 (est.)93
    Reviews found online7792

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 75

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 92

    No road tests of wet for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +10
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 69 (est.)76
    Reviews found online7081

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 81.3 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    82
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests–93
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 82

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 67

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +19
    86
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 67 (est.)96
    Reviews found online6770

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 69.8 = 86

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 82

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +8
    90
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Reviews found online8290
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Relative Score 74 90
Dry 75 94
Wet 75 92
Comfort 69 79
Noise – 82
Treadwear 67 86
Handling (owners) 82 90
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza Adrenalin RE004

± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Pros

  • Exceptional steering precision and turn-in response due to a stiff sidewall construction.
  • Strong dry-weather grip and stability during high-speed cornering.
  • Significant improvement in wet-weather performance compared to the previous RE003 generation.

Cons

  • Inconsistent reports on road noise, with some users finding it intrusive at highway speeds.
  • Polarized feedback on tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear under aggressive driving.
  • Stiffer sidewall can lead to a harsher ride quality on poor road surfaces for some vehicles.
All owner themes in the Potenza Adrenalin RE004 review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and confidence in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Noticeably lower road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and progressive handling at the limit

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
  • Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly squishy feel or floatiness during aggressive quick transitions
  • Some susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water at high speeds
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Positive

The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-12-06

“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
taycanforum.com ·2026-04-02

“you could fit them but they are not NF rated, only 5 is NF0 and NF1 rated but on the 21" sized for the sedan.”
f30.bimmerpost.com

“Hi guys thanks for your input and sharing what you are using. I have gone for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with 20% off so worked out around £150 each fitted.”
Top themes
#Strong dry grip#Michelin PS5 comparison#Comfort and ride harshness#Wear and durability#Cold-weather performance concerns#Value and pricing#BMW star OEM version#EV-ready and fitment questions

Based on 29 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—130
Rim diameters—17″ – 23″
Tread depth—7 - 9/32″
UTQG—260 - 300 AA A
Treadwear warranty—30,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better dry, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 94 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 86 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 92 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 79 vs 69 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 92 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 94 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology