tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 3 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza Adrenalin RE005 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Potenza Adrenalin RE005 or ADVAN Fleva V701 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005
Tire ABridgestone

Potenza Adrenalin RE005

Summer

± 6Provisional

Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 70 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 7 in 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests8078
    Reviews found online7368

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 73.4 = 77

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74

  2. 73

    Wet

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7470
    Reviews found online7264

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 72.3 = 73

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online–12

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.3 = 36

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7262
    Reviews found online6261

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 40% × 71.9 + 60% × 62.2 = 66

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62

  5. 69

    Noise

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7175
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)60

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Potenza Adrenalin RE005. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6659

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza Adrenalin RE005. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza Adrenalin RE005 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online7472
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 72 70
Dry 77 74
Wet 73 67
Snow – 36
Comfort 66 62
Noise 69 69
Treadwear 66 69
Handling (owners) 74 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Potenza Adrenalin RE005

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPotenza Adrenalin RE005ADVAN Fleva V701ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 91% #6/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 97% #3/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #3/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/7 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza Adrenalin RE005

Pros

  • High levels of dry grip for spirited and daily driving
  • Direct, responsive, and stable handling with good steering feedback
  • Firm sidewalls providing high confidence in corners

Cons

  • Tire noise increases as the tread wears down
  • Aquaplaning resistance worsens significantly with wear
All owner themes in the Potenza Adrenalin RE005 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—70
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 — better wet, comfort and dry. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 scores 73 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 scores 77 vs 74 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza Adrenalin RE005 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza Adrenalin RE005 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005, 73 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza Adrenalin RE005 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005, 77 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Potenza Adrenalin RE005 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza Adrenalin RE005 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza Adrenalin RE005 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology