tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 23 + 213 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN A052 is ahead, 73–57

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN A052 or Potenza RE-71R on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN A052
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN A052

Summer

± 6

Tests 76 · 4 tests Owners 69 · 213 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    ADVAN A052 +8
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE-71RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 70 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7490

    Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 72

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 90.4 = 80

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 61

    Wet

    ADVAN A052 +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE-71RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 63 (est.)78
    Reviews found online5867

    Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 78 + 40% × 67.4 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 45

    Snow

    ADVAN A052 +28
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE-71RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online3075

    Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 55.6 (est.) + 40% × 30.3 = 45

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 73

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 48

    Comfort

    ADVAN A052 +20
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE-71RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)75
    Reviews found online3763

    Potenza RE-71R: 40% × 63.4 (est.) + 60% × 37.4 = 48

    ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 63.4 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    ADVAN A052 +17
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE-71RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)77
    Reviews found online5177

    Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 60

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 77 + 40% × 76.9 = 77

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 30

    Treadwear

    ADVAN A052 +20
    50
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE-71RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests37≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online1839

    Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 37.5 + 40% × 18.2 = 30

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN A052 +17
    85
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE-71RADVAN A052
    Reviews found online6885
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE-71RYokohama ADVAN A052
Relative Score 57 73
Dry 72 80
Wet 61 74
Snow 45 73
Comfort 48 68
Noise 60 77
Treadwear 30 50
Handling (owners) 68 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE-71R

± 6

ADVAN A052

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPotenza RE-71RADVAN A052ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires #4/5 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE-71R

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and exceptional cornering traction
  • Fast heat-up times, making them ideal for autocross and time attacks
  • Consistent performance throughout the lifespan of the tire

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan, wearing faster in hot weather or heavy track use
  • Noticeable road noise on the highway due to the aggressive tread pattern
  • Uncomfortable and stiff ride quality for daily driving
All owner themes in the Potenza RE-71R review

Tire B ADVAN A052

Pros

  • Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
  • Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
  • Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
  • Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
  • Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
All owner themes in the ADVAN A052 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Positive

Community members widely view the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-grip competition tire suited for autocross and track driving. While praised for its light weight and superior all-out performance compared to standard street and summer tires, users frequently discuss its high cost, soft compound, potential lack of tread longevity on long road trips, and tendency to fling rocks.

r/tires ·9 upvotes ·2020-01-18

“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
r/944 ·7 upvotes ·2026-07-09

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2023-07-04

“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Top themes
#competition and autocross performance#tire weight comparison#track day durability#soft compound longevity#200 treadwear grip#fitment and sizing

Based on 11 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—61
Rim diameters—13″ – 20″
Tread depth8/32″7/32″
UTQG200 A A200 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better snow, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 73 vs 45 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 68 vs 48 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 50 vs 30 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 77 vs 60 on noise.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE-71R or ADVAN A052?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE-71R or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 74 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE-71R or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 80 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza RE-71R or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 73 vs 45 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE-71R or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 77 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE-71R or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 68 vs 48 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE-71R or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 50 vs 30 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology