tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE001 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 42 + 3,611 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 85–66

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Potenza RE001 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Summer

± 4

Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 80 · 3,611 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +16
    85
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests≈ 69 (est.)85
    Reviews found online6985

    Potenza RE001: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 84.7 = 85

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +22
    89
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests≈ 68 (est.)92
    Reviews found online6585

    Potenza RE001: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.1 + 40% × 85.1 = 89

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +23
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 66 (est.)91
    Reviews found online5374

    Potenza RE001: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.3 = 58

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 90.7 + 60% × 74 = 81

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests–73
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 61

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +17
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 63 (est.)83
    Reviews found online5771

    Potenza RE001: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 70.9 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +16
    84
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Reviews found online6884
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–61
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE001Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Relative Score 66 85
Dry 69 85
Wet 67 89
Comfort 58 81
Noise – 70
Treadwear 61 78
Handling (owners) 68 84
Efficiency – 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE001

± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE001

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and steering feedback
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • High levels of road noise on coarse surfaces
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance
All owner themes in the Potenza RE001 review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Precise steering response and high-speed stability
  • Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
  • Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE001

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Positive

Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.

taycanforum.com ·1 upvote ·2026-04-06

“2024 J1.1 GTS Sport Turismo on 21" Spyder RS wheels here. Went from Pirelli PZero's to NF1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's recently. They don't seem any louder than the PZero's, dry grip seems about the same, as does comfort. Wet grip and performance in cold conditions (I'm in Scotland, UK) over the PZero's is noticeably better. Very little in the way of the Ackerman effect in cold temperatures, compared to the PZero's which made an awful noise and skipped badly when turning at slow speeds, pulling out of junctions. Will see how they do wear rate wise, PZero's had about 2.5 to 3mm left at 16k miles. Anything approaching that on the ASY5's would be good. Unfortunately on the J1.1 on 21"'s the choice is essentially PZero's or ASY5's. Which is disappointing as I had PS4S's and CSC7's on my previous cars (G81 M3 and M340i Touring) and they were fantastic.”
forums.mbclub.co.uk ·3 upvotes ·2023-01-26

“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Top themes
#wet grip performance#comparison to Michelin PS4#road noise levels#cold temperature handling#full lock scrubbing

Based on 13 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE001 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth—7 - 9/32″
UTQG—300 - 500 A - AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE001

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 81 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 89 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 78 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 85 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE001
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE001 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE001 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 89 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE001 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 85 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE001 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 81 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE001 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 78 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology