Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Falken WildPeak A/T3W — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 8 + 441 owner reviews. How we score

WildPeak A/T3W is ahead, 72–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken WildPeak A/T3W
Tire BFalken

WildPeak A/T3W

All-Terrain tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 441 reviews

“New wheels for the 50 New wheels on the cx50. Wasn’t 100% sure about the bronze on red but I like it. 17x8 sport terrain cv-1 wheels and 235/65R17 Wildpeak A/T3W tires.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    WildPeak A/T3W +13
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030WildPeak A/T3W
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5575

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59

    WildPeak A/T3W: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for WildPeak A/T3W. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 56

    Wet

    WildPeak A/T3W +19
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030WildPeak A/T3W
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online5177

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56

    WildPeak A/T3W: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for WildPeak A/T3W. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030WildPeak A/T3W
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online–72

    WildPeak A/T3W: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 71

    No road tests of snow for WildPeak A/T3W. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 56

    Comfort

    WildPeak A/T3W +15
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030WildPeak A/T3W
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4373

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56

    WildPeak A/T3W: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030 or WildPeak A/T3W. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030WildPeak A/T3W
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    WildPeak A/T3W: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for WildPeak A/T3W. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE030 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030WildPeak A/T3W
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)60
    Reviews found online6973

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    WildPeak A/T3W: 60% × 60.1 + 40% × 73.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    WildPeak A/T3W +22
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030WildPeak A/T3W
    Reviews found online4971
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Falken WildPeak A/T3W: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE030Falken WildPeak A/T3W
Relative Score 58 72
Dry 59 72
Wet 56 75
Snow – 71
Comfort 56 71
Noise – 69
Treadwear 67 65
Handling (owners) 49 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE030

WildPeak A/T3W

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE030

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Reliable and consistent dry road grip
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of cabin road noise
  • Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
  • Tendency toward understeer
All owner themes in the Potenza RE030 review

Tire B WildPeak A/T3W

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in snow, ice, and wet weather conditions
  • Surprisingly low road noise and smooth ride quality for an all-terrain tire
  • Strong durability and long tread life with high mileage capabilities

Cons

  • Balancing difficulties and persistent high-speed vibration reported by a subset of users
  • Occasional reports of accelerated tread wear or cupping, particularly on heavier or commercial vehicles
  • Some users noted reduced traction in deep mud or specific wet/greasy gravel conditions
All owner themes in the WildPeak A/T3W review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken WildPeak A/T3W

Positive

Community members hold a strongly positive opinion of the Falken Wildpeak A/T3W, frequently praising its exceptional snow, ice, and wet weather traction along with low road noise and comfortable ride quality. Users also appreciate its rugged durability, off-road capability, and long tread life, with many expressing intent to purchase another set despite concerns about discontinuation and stock availability.

Top themes
#snow and winter traction#low road noise#wet weather handling#tread life and durability#fitment and sizing questions#off-road performance

Based on 24 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 B · Falken WildPeak A/T3W
CategorySummerAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—5
Rim diameters—17″ – 18″
Tread depth—12/32″
UTQG—660 B B
Treadwear warranty—55,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

Falken WildPeak A/T3W

Winner: Falken WildPeak A/T3W — better handling, wet and comfort. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken WildPeak A/T3W scores 71 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken WildPeak A/T3W scores 75 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Falken WildPeak A/T3W scores 71 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken WildPeak A/T3W scores 72 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Tire B · Falken WildPeak A/T3W

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE030 or WildPeak A/T3W?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or WildPeak A/T3W?

Falken WildPeak A/T3W, 75 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or WildPeak A/T3W?

Falken WildPeak A/T3W, 72 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or WildPeak A/T3W?

Falken WildPeak A/T3W, 71 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or WildPeak A/T3W?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology