Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Pirelli P6 Fourseasons — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
P6 Fourseasons is ahead, 67–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
P6 Fourseasons +867Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 55 66 Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
P6 Fourseasons +1167Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 51 66 Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison55Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 45 P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 55
No road tests of snow for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
56
Comfort
P6 Fourseasons +1066Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 43 62 Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030 or P6 Fourseasons. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison63Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 57 P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 63
No road tests of noise for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 68 Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
P6 Fourseasons +2069Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 P6 Fourseasons Reviews found online 49 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Pirelli P6 Fourseasons |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 67 |
| Dry | 59 | 67 |
| Wet | 56 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | 56 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 63 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE030
P6 Fourseasons
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE030
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
Tire B P6 Fourseasons
Pros
- Excellent grip and stability in both wet and dry road conditions
- Durable tread wear reported by multiple long-term users
- Good cornering stability and road feedback
Cons
- Subpar traction and performance in deeper snow or ice
- Can exhibit a somewhat harsh ride depending on vehicle application
- Some users reported higher than expected noise levels
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Pirelli P6 Fourseasons |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 400 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons
Winner: Pirelli P6 Fourseasons — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli P6 Fourseasons rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons scores 69 vs 49 on handling.
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons scores 67 vs 56 on wet.
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons scores 66 vs 56 on comfort.
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons scores 67 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE030 or P6 Fourseasons?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or P6 Fourseasons?
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons, 67 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or P6 Fourseasons?
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons, 67 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or P6 Fourseasons?
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons, 66 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or P6 Fourseasons?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology