Pirelli P6 Fourseasons looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact TX vs Pirelli P6 Fourseasons — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 43 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

ProContact TX is ahead, 69–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    ProContact TX +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXP6 Fourseasons
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6861

    ProContact TX: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    No road tests of dry for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    ProContact TX +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXP6 Fourseasons
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7361

    ProContact TX: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64

    No road tests of wet for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Snow

    ProContact TX +10
    54
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXP6 Fourseasons
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5943

    ProContact TX: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 64

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.5 = 54

    No road tests of snow for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    ProContact TX +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXP6 Fourseasons
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6555

    ProContact TX: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66

    P6 Fourseasons: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 55.4 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    ProContact TX +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXP6 Fourseasons
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6752

    ProContact TX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 66

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 60

    No road tests of noise for ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    ProContact TX +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXP6 Fourseasons
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7366

    ProContact TX: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXP6 Fourseasons
    Reviews found online–64
Scores at a glance
Continental ProContact TX vs Pirelli P6 Fourseasons: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ProContact TXPirelli P6 Fourseasons
Relative Score 69 62
Dry 68 63
Wet 72 64
Snow 64 54
Comfort 66 60
Noise 66 60
Treadwear 71 66
Handling (owners) – 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ProContact TX

± 8

P6 Fourseasons

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact TX

Pros

  • Strong value for the money, frequently described as an excellent budget-friendly option with a great price-to-quality ratio
  • Quiet, smooth, comfortable ride, with several owners praising noise reduction and one noting it is quieter than previous Bridgestone run-flats
  • Solid dry and wet performance, including good rain handling and a secure, planted feel on the road

Cons

  • Snow and ice traction is inconsistent, described as average at best or prone to slipping in mild snow by some owners
  • Highway road noise was criticized by one owner at speeds of 65 mph and above, which they found unacceptable at the price
  • Tread life was considered shorter than hoped by at least one reviewer
All owner themes in the ProContact TX review

Tire B P6 Fourseasons

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability in both wet and dry road conditions
  • Durable tread wear reported by multiple long-term users
  • Good cornering stability and road feedback

Cons

  • Subpar traction and performance in deeper snow or ice
  • Can exhibit a somewhat harsh ride depending on vehicle application
  • Some users reported higher than expected noise levels
All owner themes in the P6 Fourseasons review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact TX B · Pirelli P6 Fourseasons
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available49—
Rim diameters15″ – 21″—
Tread depth8 - 10/32″14/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A A - B400 A A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact TX

Pirelli P6 Fourseasons

Winner: Continental ProContact TX — better snow, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Pirelli P6 Fourseasons rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ProContact TX scores 64 vs 54 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ProContact TX scores 72 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ProContact TX scores 66 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental ProContact TX scores 66 vs 60 on noise.

Tire A · Continental ProContact TX
Tire B · Pirelli P6 Fourseasons

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?

Continental ProContact TX, 72 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?

Continental ProContact TX, 68 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?

Continental ProContact TX, 64 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?

Continental ProContact TX, 66 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?

Continental ProContact TX, 66 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?

Continental ProContact TX, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology