Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 43 reviews
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ProContact TX vs Pirelli P6 Fourseasons — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 43 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
ProContact TX is ahead, 69–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
ProContact TX +563Why this score
Source ProContact TX P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 68 61 ProContact TX: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63
No road tests of dry for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
ProContact TX +864Why this score
Source ProContact TX P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 73 61 ProContact TX: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64
No road tests of wet for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Snow
ProContact TX +1054Why this score
Source ProContact TX P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 59 43 ProContact TX: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 64
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.5 = 54
No road tests of snow for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
ProContact TX +660Why this score
Source ProContact TX P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 55 ProContact TX: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
P6 Fourseasons: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 55.4 = 60
No road tests of comfort for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
66
Noise
ProContact TX +660Why this score
Source ProContact TX P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 52 ProContact TX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 66
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 60
No road tests of noise for ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
ProContact TX +566Why this score
Source ProContact TX P6 Fourseasons Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 73 66 ProContact TX: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71
P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison64Why this score
Source ProContact TX P6 Fourseasons Reviews found online – 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact TX | Pirelli P6 Fourseasons |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 62 |
| Dry | 68 | 63 |
| Wet | 72 | 64 |
| Snow | 64 | 54 |
| Comfort | 66 | 60 |
| Noise | 66 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ProContact TX
P6 Fourseasons
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact TX
Pros
- Strong value for the money, frequently described as an excellent budget-friendly option with a great price-to-quality ratio
- Quiet, smooth, comfortable ride, with several owners praising noise reduction and one noting it is quieter than previous Bridgestone run-flats
- Solid dry and wet performance, including good rain handling and a secure, planted feel on the road
Cons
- Snow and ice traction is inconsistent, described as average at best or prone to slipping in mild snow by some owners
- Highway road noise was criticized by one owner at speeds of 65 mph and above, which they found unacceptable at the price
- Tread life was considered shorter than hoped by at least one reviewer
Tire B P6 Fourseasons
Pros
- Excellent grip and stability in both wet and dry road conditions
- Durable tread wear reported by multiple long-term users
- Good cornering stability and road feedback
Cons
- Subpar traction and performance in deeper snow or ice
- Can exhibit a somewhat harsh ride depending on vehicle application
- Some users reported higher than expected noise levels
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact TX | B · Pirelli P6 Fourseasons |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 8 - 10/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A A - B | 400 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ProContact TX
Pirelli P6 Fourseasons
Winner: Continental ProContact TX — better snow, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Pirelli P6 Fourseasons rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ProContact TX scores 64 vs 54 on snow.
Continental ProContact TX scores 72 vs 64 on wet.
Continental ProContact TX scores 66 vs 60 on comfort.
Continental ProContact TX scores 66 vs 60 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?
Which is better in the wet, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?
Continental ProContact TX, 72 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?
Continental ProContact TX, 68 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?
Continental ProContact TX, 64 vs 54 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?
Continental ProContact TX, 66 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?
Continental ProContact TX, 66 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ProContact TX or P6 Fourseasons?
Continental ProContact TX, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology