tirewheelguide

Pirelli P6 Fourseasons looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Pirelli P6 Fourseasons vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 8 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth RV02 leads, 65–63 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth RV02 or P6 Fourseasons on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    P6 Fourseasons +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceP6 FourseasonsBluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)58
    Reviews found online6168

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 67.6 = 62

    No road tests of dry for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 64

    Wet

    BluEarth RV02 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceP6 FourseasonsBluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6172

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 67 + 40% × 72.1 = 69

    No road tests of wet for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 54

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceP6 FourseasonsBluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)–
    Reviews found online43–

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.5 = 54

    No road tests of snow for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    BluEarth RV02 +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceP6 FourseasonsBluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)61
    Reviews found online5569

    P6 Fourseasons: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 55.4 = 60

    BluEarth RV02: 40% × 61.2 + 60% × 68.9 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    BluEarth RV02 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceP6 FourseasonsBluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)64
    Reviews found online52≈ 66 (est.)

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 60

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 64.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 65

    No road tests of noise for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth RV02. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    P6 Fourseasons +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceP6 FourseasonsBluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6652

    P6 Fourseasons: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66

    BluEarth RV02: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 51.9 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for P6 Fourseasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth RV02 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceP6 FourseasonsBluEarth RV02
    Reviews found online6469
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceP6 FourseasonsBluEarth RV02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryPirelli P6 FourseasonsYokohama BluEarth RV02
Relative Score 63 65
Dry 63 62
Wet 64 69
Snow 54 –
Comfort 60 66
Noise 60 65
Treadwear 66 61
Handling (owners) 64 69
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

P6 Fourseasons

± 10

BluEarth RV02

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A P6 Fourseasons

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability in both wet and dry road conditions
  • Durable tread wear reported by multiple long-term users
  • Good cornering stability and road feedback

Cons

  • Subpar traction and performance in deeper snow or ice
  • Can exhibit a somewhat harsh ride depending on vehicle application
  • Some users reported higher than expected noise levels
All owner themes in the P6 Fourseasons review

Tire B BluEarth RV02

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
  • Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
All owner themes in the BluEarth RV02 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Pirelli P6 Fourseasons B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—4
Rim diameters—17″ – 18″
Tread depth14/32″—
UTQG400 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Pirelli P6 Fourseasons

Yokohama BluEarth RV02

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — better comfort, wet and noise. Pick the Pirelli P6 Fourseasons if treadwear matters most to you. Pirelli P6 Fourseasons rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 66 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Pirelli P6 Fourseasons scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 69 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 65 vs 60 on noise.

Tire A · Pirelli P6 Fourseasons
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

P6 Fourseasons or BluEarth RV02?

Which is better in the wet, P6 Fourseasons or BluEarth RV02?

Yokohama BluEarth RV02, 69 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, P6 Fourseasons or BluEarth RV02?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, P6 Fourseasons or BluEarth RV02?

Yokohama BluEarth RV02, 65 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, P6 Fourseasons or BluEarth RV02?

Yokohama BluEarth RV02, 66 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, P6 Fourseasons or BluEarth RV02?

Pirelli P6 Fourseasons, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology