Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 2,182 reviews
“Got my Camelot rims mounted with Bridgestone Potenza Re050a tires!”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 2,182 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE050A leads, 57–54 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 2,182 reviews
“Got my Camelot rims mounted with Bridgestone Potenza Re050a tires!”
Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 19 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 58 | 52 |
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61
Potenza S007: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 58
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Potenza S007. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 62 (est.) | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 54 |
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
Potenza S007: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Potenza S007. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 49 | – |
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 57
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 39 | 38 |
Potenza RE050A: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.9 = 49
Potenza S007: 40% × 63.3 (est.) + 60% × 37.5 = 48
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050A or Potenza S007. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 56 | – |
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 62
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE050A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 57 (est.) | ≈ 54 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 41 | 31 |
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 51
Potenza S007: 60% × 53.9 (est.) + 40% × 31.1 = 45
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S007. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Potenza RE050A | Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 55 | 50 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A | Bridgestone Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 54 |
| Dry | 61 | 58 |
| Wet | 59 | 58 |
| Snow | 57 | – |
| Comfort | 49 | 48 |
| Noise | 62 | – |
| Treadwear | 51 | 45 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE050A
Potenza S007
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is largely mixed, with drivers acknowledging solid dry grip, responsive handling, and decent wet traction when warm. However, many owners criticize the tire's harsh ride quality, high road noise, fast treadwear, high replacement cost, and complete lack of traction in cold or snowy conditions. Run-flat variants are particularly disliked for their stiff ride and difficulty of repair.
“It's been 4 years and 30,000km's and the PS4S tyres have worn up to the wear mark on the back tyres. Any recommendations for a replacement? It's summer all year here. We have hot summer and less hot summer. I went with the PS4S because I found the OEM RE050A's too stiff and the PS4S was definitely softer. I would consider going softer again if there was a good option. For PS4S again it will be 2 x $564 for 235/40R19 and 2 x $610 for 265/35R19 = $2348 AUD or, if I try the new PS5 it is 2 x $374 for 245/40R19 and 2 x 472 for 275/35R19 = $1692 AUD The PS5's are way cheaper and have a tread wear of 340 vs the 300. I have also heard good things about the Falken FK510”
“I've had these tires on my E60 for the last four years - in the summer. I left them on the first winter I had the car and (re-)learned quickly that these summer tires are simply not designed for temperatures below 40F. Even when trying to drive carefully, I once slid right off the road while going around a corner. There were no other cars around at the time and no harm was done, but it was the last reminder for me. I now use a dedicated set of winter tires/wheels, and only put the summer tires on between April and October.”
“tbear, only have my subjective experience to go by.. Had the RE050A as the OEM tires on by 2008. I could get them to slip and slid at autocross (not on purpose) even with an un-tuned automatic. Have switched to the Michelin Pilot Sport AS all seasons (they have changed the model designations since the last time I purchased but these are not the Pilot Super SPorts) and am finding the ride quieter and very very grippy. Seems like all seasons would be a good choice for the Atlanta area? rakessler”
Based on 76 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A | B · Bridgestone Potenza S007 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 37 | 12 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 140 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Bridgestone Potenza S007
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza RE050A — better treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza S007 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A scores 51 vs 45 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A scores 61 vs 58 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 58 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A, 61 vs 58 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 49 vs 48 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A, 51 vs 45 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology