Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 27 road tests and 2,182 + 6,614 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 S is ahead, 85–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

Summer

± 4

Tests 82 · 27 tests Owners 86 · 6,614 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

“A note about the pilot sport 4 S: in cold weather (below 5 degrees) even if it isn't icy, the tyre compound hardens and has dramatically reduced grip. They are excellent summer tyres though, good in the wet too. These days I run Uniroyal rainsport 5 and they're very good.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 S +32
    93
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests≈ 64 (est.)94
    Reviews found online5892

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 94.3 + 40% × 92.1 = 93

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 59

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 S +29
    88
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests≈ 62 (est.)86
    Reviews found online5591

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 86.4 + 40% × 90.7 = 88

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 49

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 S +30
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 64 (est.)70
    Reviews found online3984

    Potenza RE050A: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.9 = 49

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 40% × 70.4 + 60% × 84.2 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 S +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 67 (est.)70
    Reviews found online56≈ 67 (est.)

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 62

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE050A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 51

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 S +21
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 57 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4174

    Potenza RE050A: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 51

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 55

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 S +35
    90
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 S
    Reviews found online5590
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests–72
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE050AMichelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Relative Score 57 85
Dry 61 93
Wet 59 88
Snow 57 –
Comfort 49 79
Noise 62 69
Treadwear 51 72
Handling (owners) 55 90
Efficiency – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Potenza RE050A

± 4

Pilot Sport 4 S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPotenza RE050APilot Sport 4 SΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/8 2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tyre Test #1/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE050A

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
  • Precise steering response and sharp turn-in feedback
  • Stiff sidewalls that enhance sporty handling and provide rim protection

Cons

  • Harsh ride quality and stiff impact absorption, especially over rough roads and potholes
  • Noticeable and escalating road noise as the tires wear
  • Mediocre performance and reduced traction in cold temperatures or wintry conditions
All owner themes in the Potenza RE050A review

Tire B Pilot Sport 4 S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and predictable handling in both dry and wet conditions
  • Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort compared to competitors and run-flats
  • Sharper steering response and improved cornering stability

Cons

  • High initial purchase price
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers and track users
  • Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly vague or laggy initial response during rapid steering transitions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 S review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is largely mixed, with drivers acknowledging solid dry grip, responsive handling, and decent wet traction when warm. However, many owners criticize the tire's harsh ride quality, high road noise, fast treadwear, high replacement cost, and complete lack of traction in cold or snowy conditions. Run-flat variants are particularly disliked for their stiff ride and difficulty of repair.

5series.net

“30,001 on all 4 when I changed to exact same tires. Rear tread was driver as fronts probably had 5k left in them but did not want to do this in two phases. Had tires drop shipped from Tire Rack to BMW dealer for install. Worked well. Mine are staggered (275 rear, 245 front, in 19" size ) so no rotation ever done. Probably 30-40 1/4 runs so expect my rears wore a little sooner than normal. OTOH I do live where the roads are smooth so may gain compared to others there.”

g35driver.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by EWG35 I looked at these but did not buy for two reasons. 1) the tread rating was pretty low. Although I found them on ebay in 245/35 20 and 275/30 20 for something like $650-680 I just felt they'd wear too fast. 2) The tread pattern. I don't understand how they can shed water properly. Since the tread pattern is only molded in one direction (not a right and a left) which is just flip flopped. One appears it would shed water while the other would force water under the tire. How does this work? The side wall looks pretty nice. If you think 280 tread rating is low you should look again at the RE050A's 140. It one of the hightest tread rating in ultra high performance tires. Michelin PS2 is 220, Bridgestone RE050A is just 140 and Toyo T1R is 280. The only tires i can think of that has higher tread rating is Falken 452's 300 and Kumho Ecsta SPT's 320. Tread rating 280 isn't low.”

r/FiestaST ·1 upvote ·2018-05-14

“My invoice says I travelled 71500km (just under 45K miles) on the RE050A .. but I do a lot of highway. I dialled out the toe front/rear to be toe neutral instead of toe in and rotated every 15K. Switch them out when the tread is near the wear indicators.”

Top themes
#tread life and wear#cold and snow performance#ride comfort and stiffness#dry and wet grip#high replacement cost#run flat complaints#road noise

Based on 76 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S as a benchmark max-performance summer tire, praising its outstanding dry and wet grip, stability, and daily driving refinement. Common criticisms focus on its premium price, rapid tread wear on high-powered heavy vehicles or hot track sessions, and significantly reduced grip in cold weather. Many enthusiasts consider it an ideal street tire, though some note softer sidewalls compared to predecessors or recommend dedicated track tires for hard circuit driving.

jaguarforums.com

“I had a similar experience with Discount Tire and brand new Michelin PS4S's. I clipped a large lane marker (not a dot, a turtle) with both driver's side tires and pinch-flatted them both. I had driven them less than 10 miles so Discount Tire replaced them for only $50 without me even asking for a discount. I had purchased them for about $450 each and didn't buy a road hazard warranty, so I was very pleased with Discount Tire.”

vwvortex.com ·2025-09-26

“My 2023 20th AE Golf R came with Hankook tires , and I've been very pleased with them. I'm a fairly aggressive driver and frequent the twisty roads in the Santa Monica Mountains. I also have a mildly modded Mk VI Golf R shod with Michelin Pilot Sport 4s tires on factory 18" rims, and the Hankooks seem to perform almost as well in the dry, but outshine the PS4s in the wet. I will most likely need new tires next year, but I am undecided between the Hankooks and the Michelin PS4AS tires . As for Continental tires ... I use Continental tubular tires on my road bicycle, but have experienced many problems, including massive chunking with them on my 1974 BMW 2002Tii and my 1979 Scirocco Gti , so I am not going to use them on my cars again.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2024-01-21

“My 2020 Kia Forte GT came with Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S tires. Those were not going to work in the PNW as a daily driver tire. I went right to Costco and bought some Michelin Pilot All season tires, the ones that compete with the Continental DWS at the time. I listed the take offs on Craigslist for $400 and sold them that day.”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Track day durability#High price vs alternatives#Tread life and wear#Cold weather performance#Sidewall stiffness and comfort

Based on 208 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available37110
Rim diameters15″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG140 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common2323

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 93 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 79 vs 49 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 88 vs 59 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 88 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 93 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 69 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 79 vs 49 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE050A or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 72 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology