tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Yokohama ADVAN A048 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE11 is ahead, 73–64

Check price on Amazon · Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN A048
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN A048

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 9 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Potenza RE11 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8375

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 77

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Potenza RE11 +14
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7455

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 56

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)–
    Reviews found online46–

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Potenza RE11 +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7053

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Potenza RE11 +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6860

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE11 +12
    54
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN A048
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6645

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    ADVAN A048: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A048. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE11 +8
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN A048
    Reviews found online7870
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE11Yokohama ADVAN A048
Relative Score 73 64
Dry 77 73
Wet 73 59
Snow 56 –
Comfort 69 61
Noise 68 64
Treadwear 66 54
Handling (owners) 78 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE11

ADVAN A048

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE11

Pros

  • Surreal and formidable dry grip
  • Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
  • Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use

Cons

  • Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
  • Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
  • Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
All owner themes in the Potenza RE11 review

Tire B ADVAN A048

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering adhesion
  • High level of steering feedback and handling precision
  • Progressive breakaway characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear during track sessions
  • High road noise levels
  • Difficult to maintain optimal operating temperatures
All owner themes in the ADVAN A048 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 B · Yokohama ADVAN A048
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG200 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11

Yokohama ADVAN A048

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama ADVAN A048 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 73 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 66 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 78 vs 70 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A048
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 73 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 77 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN A048?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 66 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology