tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 79 + 6,420 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is ahead, 78–53

Check price on Amazon · ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS or Potenza S001 RFT on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Tire BContinental

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

All Season

± 5

Tests 76 · 3 tests Owners 81 · 6,420 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)

“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +26
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 59 (est.)76
    Reviews found online4688

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 54

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 87.6 = 80

    No road tests of dry for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 58

    Wet

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +23
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 61 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5391

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 91.4 = 81

    No road tests of wet for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 42

    Snow

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +35
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 55 (est.)80
    Reviews found online2272

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 21.9 = 42

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 71.6 = 77

    No road tests of snow for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 45

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +34
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 62 (est.)74
    Reviews found online3483

    Potenza S001 RFT: 40% × 61.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.5 = 45

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 40% × 74.4 + 60% × 82.5 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 61

    Noise

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)71
    Reviews found online5279

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 61

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 79.1 = 74

    No road tests of noise for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +11
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5371

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +35
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Reviews found online4883
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza S001 RFTContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Relative Score 53 78
Dry 54 80
Wet 58 81
Snow 42 77
Comfort 45 79
Noise 61 74
Treadwear 58 69
Handling (owners) 48 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Potenza S001 RFT

± 5

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza S001 RFT

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
  • Strong dry-road grip

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
  • Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 RFT review

Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Pros

  • Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
  • Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Positive

The community generally views the DWS 06 Plus as one of the best ultra-high-performance all-season tires. Owners praise its wet and dry grip, ride comfort, quietness, and light-snow manners, and many compare it favorably to the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, often at a lower price. Criticisms include inconsistent tread life (some report about 25k miles while others get 50k), balancing difficulty, soft sidewall or squirmy feel, noise as the tires age, and the fact that they are not a substitute for dedicated winter tires.

rennlist.com

“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”
r/TeslaModelY ·1 upvote ·2026-09-24

“I picked these up from tire rack Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires in 255/45ZR19 and these rims MSW Type 37T and the tpms. they were bal;anced and ready to install. I swapped out my stock 21" MYP tires. NYC/Catskills area. they are good in snowy conditions as long as it's not too high above the clearance, I've had to pop the side trim back on when fender hits small mounds of snow .”
mbworld.org

“I have these same tires on my SL 550 and my wife's GLC 43 AMG. The tires are wearing great so far. Smooth ride on both vehicles. I have around 16,000 miles on the set on my SL 550 and around 18,000 miles on my wife's SUV. Plenty of tread life left on both sets. 19" wheels on the SL and 20" wheels on the GLC. Both sets are staggered, so no rotating of either set. Will definitely buy these again when needed.”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Ride comfort and noise#Light snow capability#Versus Michelin PS A/S 4#Tread life variability#Balancing and squirm issues#Value and price#Fitment and wheel sizes

Based on 139 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available14120
Rim diameters17″ – 21″16″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG280 A A560 - 740 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — better snow, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 77 vs 42 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 83 vs 48 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 79 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 54 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza S001 RFT or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza S001 RFT or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 81 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S001 RFT or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 80 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza S001 RFT or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 77 vs 42 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Potenza S001 RFT or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 74 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza S001 RFT or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 79 vs 45 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza S001 RFT or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 69 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology