Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 79 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Potenza S001 RFT 55, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat 56.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
54
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat +458Why this score
Source Potenza S001 RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 46 53 Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.5 = 58
No road tests of dry for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
Potenza S001 RFT +157Why this score
Source Potenza S001 RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 53 52 Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 58
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
42
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza S001 RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) – Reviews found online 22 – Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 21.8 = 42
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
45
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat +550Why this score
Source Potenza S001 RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 34 41 Potenza S001 RFT: 40% × 61.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.7 = 45
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 40.6 = 50
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza S001 RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 52 – Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61
No road tests of noise for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Potenza S001 RFT +454Why this score
Source Potenza S001 RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 53 46 Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
48
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza S001 RFT Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Reviews found online 48 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 56 |
| Dry | 54 | 58 |
| Wet | 58 | 57 |
| Snow | 42 | – |
| Comfort | 45 | 50 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 58 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
55
/ 100
Potenza S001 RFT
56
/ 100
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza S001 RFT
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
- Strong dry-road grip
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
- Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 14 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
55
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
56
/ 100
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT is stronger on treadwear. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat is stronger on comfort and dry. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat scores 50 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 58 vs 54 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat scores 58 vs 54 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza S001 RFT or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza S001 RFT or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 57 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S001 RFT or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat, 58 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza S001 RFT or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat, 50 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza S001 RFT or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat?
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT, 58 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology