Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,811 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 5,811 + 259 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta PS31 leads, 65–63 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,811 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 60 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 60 = 72
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63
No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 86 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 68 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 58 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 38 | 50 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 50
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 63 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 65 |
Potenza S001: 40% × 63.3 + 60% × 47.2 = 54
Ecsta PS31: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 56 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 67 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 55.8 = 56
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 58 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 43 | 65 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 58 + 40% × 42.7 = 52
Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 60 | 69 |
| Source | Potenza S001 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 41 | – |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Kumho Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 65 |
| Dry | 72 | 63 |
| Wet | 75 | 69 |
| Snow | 50 | 58 |
| Comfort | 54 | 66 |
| Noise | 56 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 69 |
| Efficiency | 41 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza S001
Ecsta PS31
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.
“Potenza S001 cracking Has anyone had issues with their OEM Bridgestone Potenza S001 tires cracking? I have OEM tires on my 2018 CLub with 17k miles with cracking in the treads for all 4 tires and because they are 4 years + 3 months past manufacture date, Bridgestone told me to Beat It. These are $185 tires that don't last 4 seasons....why would I ever buy them if they are PoS?”
“I put the Potenza S001 tires on the rear of my i3s with that Tire Rack deal but I didn't think they would fit on the 5.5 inch rims. I think the rears are 6.0".”
“Replacing Bridgestone Potenza s001 RunFlats with Primacy 5 vs. PS5. Suggestions? I drive a VW Jetta which only has 160 Hp. I do occasionally really enjoy some spirited driving or taking aggressive turns. My considerations are that I do really care about Comfort and road noise and so that leads me towards the Primacy 5. At the same time, I don't think the power of my car justifies the PS5. My question is basically, I've online that for runflats to be runflats they have really stiff sidewalls, which might be contributing to the current feel of my car and I wonder if, even though everything else about the Potenza s001 is quite worse compared to the Primacy 5, I wonder if I will miss the stiff sidewall? And just because of that should I consider the PS5?”
Based on 43 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 55 | 21 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 460 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Kumho Ecsta PS31
Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better treadwear, comfort and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 if dry and wet matter most to you.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 65 vs 52 on treadwear.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 66 vs 54 on comfort.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 56 on noise.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 scores 72 vs 63 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Potenza S001, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Potenza S001, 72 vs 63 on our dry score.
Kumho Ecsta PS31, 58 vs 50 on our snow score.
Kumho Ecsta PS31, 67 vs 56 on our noise score.
Kumho Ecsta PS31, 66 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Kumho Ecsta PS31, 65 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology