Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 55 · 5,807 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 5,807 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Potenza S001 65, Proxes RA1 66.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 55 · 5,807 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 79 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 62.7 = 73
Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 84 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 61 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 62.3 = 76
Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 59 (est.) | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 38 | 34 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 51
Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 63 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 51 | 66 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 63.3 + 40% × 51.1 = 58
Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 56 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 70 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 58.6 = 57
Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of noise for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 58 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 48 | 68 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 58 + 40% × 48.4 = 54
Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 73 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 66 |
| Dry | 73 | 75 |
| Wet | 76 | 64 |
| Snow | 51 | 49 |
| Comfort | 58 | 67 |
| Noise | 57 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza S001
Proxes RA1
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.
“Brand New Bridgestone Potenza S001 Tyres worn after 10k mileage? So I got 4 brand new tyres last June from Costco, 255/35 R19. I only drive locally, occasional trips to another city. 10k mileage later, my front two tyres flagged up on my recent MOT as : Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge CHANGE ASAP (5.2.3 (e)) Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge EDGED (5.2.3 (e)) Seems surprising to me as I don't drive crazy, occasional spirited driving. 2011 Audi s5. is this normal? Thinking of getting another brand this time for the front two tyres. Car is a quattro but same types on same axis should suffice? Any recommendations on tyres? Read more”
“I run the Bridgestone Potenza S001 Ultra-High Summer Peformance Tire 215/45R/20s on the rear and 195s on the front. They ride softer than stock tires. Not cheap tho.”
“Thanks for the comments. I'm not sure a paltry $3m fine will move BMW to more or quicker recalls. It's just a drop in the bucket for them. In this case too, BMW has yet to accept any responsibility for the tire issues and has put it all on Goodyear for warranty and replacement. This is the sort of BS thing I am expecting to happen, although unlike the LS2's, I have been assured that there are no Excellence tires to be had anywhere. I just hope they do the right thing here. The latest issue of Roundel reviews the new F30 and they claim the new Bridgestone Potenza S001 uses "third generation run-flat technology", whatever that is, and say its a great tire. I called around though, and no tire dealers even have that tire in their system yet.”
Based on 43 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 55 | 7 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 100 AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Toyo Proxes RA1
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza S001 and Toyo Proxes RA1 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza S001 is stronger on wet. Toyo Proxes RA1 is stronger on treadwear, handling and noise. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 67 vs 54 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 scores 76 vs 64 on wet.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 73 vs 61 on handling.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 68 vs 57 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Potenza S001, 76 vs 64 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 51 vs 49 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 68 vs 57 on our noise score.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology